...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Field test of four methods for gas-phase ambient nitric acid
【24h】

Field test of four methods for gas-phase ambient nitric acid

机译:四种气相环境硝酸方法的现场测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three semi-continuous methods for detecting nitric acid (HNO_3) were tested against the annular denuder + filter pack (ADS) integrated collection technique at the Tampa Bay Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (BRACE) Sydney research station ~ 20 km downwind of the Tampa, Florida, urban core. The semi-continuous instruments included: two slightly differing implementations of the NO_Y - NO _(Y*) (total oxides of nitrogen minus that total denuded of HNO_3) denuder difference technique, one from the NOAA Air Resources Lab (ARL), and one from Atmospheric Research and Analysis, Inc. (ARA); the parallel plate wet diffusion scrubber + online ion chromatography technique from Texas Tech University (TTU); and the chemical ionization mass spectrometer from the Georgia Institute of Technology (GIT). Twelve hour ADS samples were collected by the University of South Florida (USF). Results for 10 min samples computed from the various higher sampling frequencies of each semi-continuous instrument showed good agreement (R~2 > 0.7) for afternoon periods of the highest production and accumulation of HNO_3. Further, agreement was within ±30% for these instruments even at HNO_3 concentrations < 0.30 ppb. The USF ADS results were biased low, however, by 44%, on average, compared to the corporate 12 h aggregated means from the semi-continuous methods, and by > 60% for the nighttime samples; ADS results were below the corporate mean maximum HNO_3 concentration by > 30% as well. The four instruments using semi-continuous methods, by contrast, were all within 10% of each other's 12 h mean mixing ratios. While only ARA employed a formal minimum detection limit at 0.050 ppb, error analysis with the other techniques established that at the same level of precision, TTU's effective limit was approximately the same as ARA's and that ARL's limit was 0.030 ppb; analysis for GIT showed no apparent effective limit at the levels of HNO_3 encountered in this field study. The importance of sample inlet height for HNO_3 measurements was indirectly shown through comparison to previous field work at this site when sample inlet heights ranged from 1.5-10m and produced systematic discrepancies in HNO_3 concentrations correlated with height of more than a factor of 2.
机译:在坦帕湾区域大气化学实验(BRACE)悉尼研究站〜佛罗里达州坦帕下风20 km处,采用环形剥蚀剂+过滤包(ADS)综合收集技术测试了三种半连续检测硝酸(HNO_3)的方法,城市核心。半连续仪器包括:NO_Y-NO _(Y *)(氮的总氧化物减去总被剥夺的HNO_3的总氮)的两种略有不同的实现方法,一种是NOAA空气资源实验室(ARL)的技术,另一种是来自大气研究与分析公司(ARA);来自德克萨斯理工大学(TTU)的平行板湿扩散洗涤塔+在线离子色谱技术;以及佐治亚理工学院(GIT)的化学电离质谱仪。南佛罗里达大学(USF)收集了12小时的ADS样品。从每种半连续仪器的各种较高采样频率计算出的10分钟样本的结果显示,在HNO_3产量和累积最高的下午时段,一致性良好(R〜2> 0.7)。此外,即使在HNO_3浓度<0.30 ppb时,这些仪器的一致性也在±30%之内。 USF ADS结果偏低,但与半连续方法的公司12小时汇总均值相比,平均偏低44%,夜间样本偏于平均60%。 ADS结果也低于公司平均最高HNO_3浓度> 30%。相比之下,使用半连续方法的四种仪器,彼此的12 h平均混合比均在10%以内。尽管只有ARA采用了形式上的最小检出限(0.050 ppb),但采用其他技术进行的误差分析表明,在相同的精度水平下,TTU的有效限度与ARA相同,而ARL的限度为0.030 ppb。对GIT的分析表明,在该现场研究中,在HNO_3水平上没有明显的有效限值。当样品入口的高度在1.5-10m范围内时,HNO_3浓度产生的系统性差异与高度的2倍以上相关,从而间接表明了样品入口高度对HNO_3测量的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号