首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Emission factors from wheat and Kentucky bluegrass stubble burning: Comparison of field and simulated burn experiments
【24h】

Emission factors from wheat and Kentucky bluegrass stubble burning: Comparison of field and simulated burn experiments

机译:小麦和肯塔基早熟禾残茬燃烧的排放因子:田间试验和模拟燃烧实验的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Emission factors (EFs) of PM_(2.5), CO, elemental carbon (EC), particulate organic carbon (OC), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and methoxyphenols (MPs) from post-harvest burning of wheat and Kentucky bluegrass (KBG) stubble were evaluated in a series of field burns. Integrated smoke samples were collected at ground level, upwind and downwind of the fires, and EFs were determined with the carbon balance method (validated during previous chamber experiments). These EFs were compared against EFs evaluated from previously conducted chamber burns, to determine how well the latter represent field scenarios. In general, when combustion efficiency (CE) differences were taken into account, a reasonable degree of agreement was observed between emission factors measured in the field and in the chamber, except for EC and solid + vapor phase PAHs, both from wheat burns. EC and PAHs from wheat burns were seen in higher amounts in the chamber, although the PAH data are in agreement at CEs > 90%. EC overestimates might be due to a misassigned EC-OC split in the heavily loaded quartz filters from chamber burns. Poor EC and OC EF-CE correlations in KBG chamber data make the comparison with field data difficult. The particulate organic matter/OC ratios (2.1 ± 1.3 for wheat and 1.9 for KBG) were higher than those observed during chamber experiments (1.5 for both wheat and KBG). Overestimates of EC in the chamber and possibly the condensation of oxygenated species in the field may be responsible for this difference. Though CO and CH4 EFs evaluated from ground-based samples differed from those collected on board a light aircraft, EF-CE relationships were similar. This underscores the importance of determining both the CEs and EFs simultaneously.
机译:小麦和肯塔基州早熟禾(KBG)收获后燃烧的PM_(2.5),CO,元素碳(EC),颗粒有机碳(OC),多环芳烃(PAH)和甲氧基酚(MP)的排放因子(EFs)在一系列田间烧伤中评估了茬。在地面,大火的上风和下风处收集了综合的烟雾样品,并通过碳平衡法(在先前的室内实验中进行了验证)确定了EF。将这些EF与先前进行的腔室燃烧评估的EF进行比较,以确定后者在野外场景中的表现如何。通常,考虑到燃烧效率(CE)的差异,在田间和室内测得的排放因子之间观察到合理的一致性,但小麦燃烧所产生的EC和固相+气相PAH除外。尽管在CEs> 90%的情况下,PAH数据一致,但在燃烧室中观察到了来自小麦烧伤的EC和PAH。 EC高估可能是由于EC-OC在重载石英过滤器中因燃烧室燃烧而分配不当所致。 KBG室内数据中EC和OC EF-CE相关性较差,很难与现场数据进行比较。颗粒有机物/ OC比率(小麦为2.1±1.3,KBG为1.9)高于室内试验中观察到的(小麦和KBG均为1.5)。室中EC的高估以及田间含氧物质的凝结可能是造成这种差异的原因。尽管从地面样品评估的CO和CH4 EF与从轻型飞机上收集的CO和CH4 EF不同,但EF-CE关系相似。这强调了同时确定CE和EF的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号