...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Satellite-based identification of aerosol particle species using a 2D-space aerosol classification model
【24h】

Satellite-based identification of aerosol particle species using a 2D-space aerosol classification model

机译:使用二维空间气溶胶分类模型基于卫星的气溶胶颗粒种类识别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The classification of aerosol types using remote sensing tools is crucial for improving our knowledge on the impacts of aerosol species on global and regional climate. Ground-based classification methods have proven useful though they are limited by discontinuous spatial observations of aerosol optical properties. As such, there is a need to develop methods in aerosol species identification using satellite data. In this study, a 2D-space model suitable for MODIS AOD bands is developed to distinguish aerosol particle species based on aerosol optical depth (AOD) and aerosol relative optical depth (AROD). The model can be used to classify five aerosol types, including biomass burning (BB: A0D(470) >= 0.45, AROD(660/470) < 0.58), urban industry (UI: AOD(470) >= 0.45, 0.68 > AROD(660)/470 >= 0.58), sub-continental (SB: AOD(470) >= 0.45, 0.91 > AROD(660/470) >= 0.68), desert dust (DD: AROD(660/470) > 0.91) and continental (CO: AOD(470) < 0.45, AROD(660/470) < 0.91). AROD values corresponding to different types of aerosols are calculated through Mie scattering theory using the aerosol particle size distribution parameters and spectral complex refractive index. The accuracy and applicability of the model are verified in three steps: 1) we compare aerosol discrimination results of model with ground-based data and the local atmospheric conditions over different regions, 2) we compare aerosol identification results from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) AOD retrieval and ground-based data, and 3) we test our model to validate its use in individual cases studies and regional observations. Our results demonstrate that aerosol species classification for each study region is consistent with the characteristics of their atmospheric conditions, and the classification results using MODIS AOD retrieval are similar to the ground-based observation results. The differences in MODIS versus AERONET AOD, caused by MODIS observation errors, is the major contributor to the differences between ground-based and satellite-based recognition results. Our three-steps validation results indicate that the 2D-space model developed in this paper can accurately identify different types of aerosols and has strong applicability. This provides a basis for the use of satellite data for continuous spatial identification of aerosol type, which greatly promotes research in related fields.
机译:使用遥感工具对气溶胶类型进行分类对于提高我们对气溶胶种类对全球和区域气候影响的认识至关重要。地面分类方法已被证明是有用的,尽管它们受到气溶胶光学特性不连续空间观察的限制。因此,需要开发使用卫星数据进行气溶胶种类识别的方法。在这项研究中,开发了适用于MODIS AOD波段的二维空间模型,以基于气溶胶光学深度(AOD)和气溶胶相对光学深度(AROD)区分气溶胶颗粒种类。该模型可用于对五种气溶胶类型进行分类,包括生物质燃烧(BB:A0D(470)> = 0.45,AROD(660/470)<0.58),城市工业(UI:AOD(470)> = 0.45、0.68>)。 AROD(660)/ 470> = 0.58),次大陆(SB:AOD(470)> = 0.45、0.91> AROD(660/470)> = 0.68),沙漠尘土(DD:AROD(660/470)> 0.91)和大陆(CO:AOD(470)<0.45,AROD(660/470)<0.91)。通过使用气溶胶粒径分布参数和光谱复数折射率的米氏散射理论,计算出与不同类型的气溶胶相对应的AROD值。分三步验证了模型的准确性和适用性:1)我们比较了模型的气溶胶判别结果与地面数据以及不同地区的局部大气状况,2)我们比较了中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)的气溶胶识别结果)AOD检索和地面数据,以及3)我们测试了模型以验证其在个别案例研究和区域观测中的使用。我们的结果表明,每个研究区域的气溶胶种类分类均与其大气条件的特征相符,并且使用MODIS AOD检索得到的分类结果与基于地面的观测结果相似。由MODIS观测误差引起的MODIS与AERONET AOD的差异是造成地面和卫星识别结果之间差异的主要原因。我们的三步验证结果表明,本文开发的二维空间模型可以准确识别不同类型的气溶胶,并且具有很强的适用性。这为利用卫星数据进行气溶胶类型的连续空间识别提供了基础,这极大地促进了相关领域的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号