首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric environment >Comparison of solid phase extraction methods for the measurement of humic-like substances (HULIS) in atmospheric particles
【24h】

Comparison of solid phase extraction methods for the measurement of humic-like substances (HULIS) in atmospheric particles

机译:固相萃取法测量大气颗粒中腐殖质(HULIS)的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Humic-like substances (HULIS) constitute a significant fraction of the water-soluble organic compounds in the environment and influence many properties of atmospheric aerosols. In this study, three solid phase extraction (SPE) methods that involve the use of hydrophilic/lipophilic balanced (HLB) resin with pure methanol (HLB-M), HLB resin with 2% (v/v) ammonia/methanol (HLB-N), and Bond Elut PPL (Priority PolLutant) resin with methanol (PPL), were compared for the isolation of HULIS from atmospheric aerosols. The HLB-N and PPL methods efficiently recovered Suwannee River fulvic acid (SRFA) and were excellent for quantifying HULIS at low levels in aerosols. All three SPE methods were favorable for the elution of aromatic and strongly UV-absorbing compounds. However, the chemical structures and molecular compositions of the HULIS isolated by the three methods showed some differences. The HULISHLB-N and HULISPPL fractions contained higher concentrations of aliphatic and aromatic C-H groups than did the HULISHLB-M fraction, indicating that relative higher content of weak polar organic species in HULIS fractions isolated by the HLB-N and PPL methods than those isolated by the HLB-M method. Moreover, the HULISHLB-N and HULISPPL were both characterized by having lower relative abundance-weighted modified aromaticity index values and higher concentrations of S-containing compounds than the HULISHLB-M, as indicated by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Some N-containing structures were identified only in the HULISHLB-N, suggesting that some of HULIS molecules were changed during the HLB-N treatment. Based on these comparisons of the three methods, we found that the PPL method serves equally good as compared to other two methods, and therefore, one can utilize PPL method also for HULIS isolation and characterization.
机译:类腐殖质(HULIS)在环境中占水溶性有机化合物的很大一部分,并影响大气气溶胶的许多特性。在这项研究中,我们采用了三种固相萃取(SPE)方法,其中包括使用亲水/亲脂平衡(HLB)树脂和纯甲醇(HLB-M),HLB树脂使用2%(v / v)氨/甲醇(HLB- N)和Bond Elut PPL(Priority PolLutant)树脂与甲醇(PPL)的比较,用于从大气气溶胶中分离HULIS。 HLB-N和PPL方法可有效回收Suwannee河黄腐酸(SRFA),对于定量分析低浓度的气溶胶中的HULIS是极好的。所有三种SPE方法均适合洗脱芳香族和强紫外线吸收性化合物。但是,三种方法分离出的HULIS的化学结构和分子组成存在一定差异。 HULISHLB-N和HULISPPL馏分比HULISHLB-M馏分包含更高浓度的脂肪族和芳香族CH基团,这表明通过HLB-N和PPL方法分离出的HULIS馏分中弱极性有机物的含量相对高于HULISHLB-M馏分中的弱极性有机物含量。 HLB-M方法。此外,如通过傅立叶变换离子回旋共振质谱法所表明的,与HULISHLB-M相比,HULISHLB-N和HULISPPL均具有较低的相对丰度加权的改性芳香指数和较高的含S化合物浓度。仅在HULISHLB-N中鉴定出一些含N的结构,这表明在HLB-N处理期间某些HULIS分子发生了变化。通过对这三种方法的比较,我们发现PPL方法与其他两种方法具有同等的优势,因此,一种方法也可以利用PPL方法进行HULIS分离和表征。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Atmospheric environment》 |2020年第3期|117370.1-117370.9|共9页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci Guangzhou Inst Geochem State Key Lab Organ Geochem Guangzhou 510640 Peoples R China|Chinese Acad Sci Guangzhou Inst Geochem Guangdong Key Lab Environm Protect & Resources Ut Guangzhou 510640 Peoples R China|Univ Chinese Acad Sci Beijing 100049 Peoples R China;

    Anhui Sci & Technol Univ Coll Resource & Environm Fengyang 233100 Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci Guangzhou Inst Geochem State Key Lab Organ Geochem Guangzhou 510640 Peoples R China|Chinese Acad Sci Guangzhou Inst Geochem Guangdong Key Lab Environm Protect & Resources Ut Guangzhou 510640 Peoples R China;

    South China Normal Univ Sch Chem & Environm Guangzhou 510006 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    HULIS; Isolation; PPL; HLB-M; HLB-N;

    机译:HULIS;隔离;PPL;HLB-M;HLB-N;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号