首页> 外文期刊>Atlantic economic journal >Did the RIAA's Prosecution of Music Piracy Impact Music Sales?
【24h】

Did the RIAA's Prosecution of Music Piracy Impact Music Sales?

机译:RIAA的音乐盗版起诉是否影响了音乐销售?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Between 2004 and 2009 it is estimated that over 30 billion songs were downloaded illegally on different peer-to-peer sharing networks according to the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). In an attempt to stop this during the late 1990’s and early 2000s the RIAA and other music labels engaged in a very public and vigorous campaign of prosecution of firms, such as Napster and Limewire, for copyright violations in order to reduce piracy. Due to the public backlash, in late 2008 the RIAA announced that they would begin to stop litigation on a grand scale. This paper examines the impact that this model of piracy prosecution had on music sales. We find evidence that the RIAA’s model of litigation actually backfired and led to decreased legitimate album sales. Additionally, we find that variation in per capita seasonally adjusted album sales cannot be explained by the existence of both Limewire and Napster file sharing services.
机译:摘要根据美国唱片业协会(RIAA)的估计,在2004年至2009年期间,在不同的对等共享网络上非法下载了300亿首歌曲。为了在1990年代末和2000年代初制止这种情况,RIAA和其他音乐唱片公司发起了一场非常公开和有力的起诉公司,例如Napster和Limewire,以侵犯版权,以减少盗版。由于公众的强烈反对,美国唱片业协会(RIAA)在2008年末宣布,他们将开始大规模停止诉讼。本文研究了这种盗版起诉模式对音乐销售的影响。我们发现有证据表明RIAA的诉讼模式实际上适得其反,并导致合法专辑销量下降。此外,我们发现,Limewire和Napster文件共享服务的存在无法解释人均季节性调整后专辑销售的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号