首页> 外文期刊>Asian Philosophy >Ritualized Exchange: A Consideration of Confucian Reciprocity
【24h】

Ritualized Exchange: A Consideration of Confucian Reciprocity

机译:礼节性交换:对儒家互惠的考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this essay I discuss reciprocity as it unfolds within the context of a Confucian relational ethic. I discuss the relationship between reciprocity and the virtue of shu or 'sympathetic understanding' and then go on to argue that the goods that grow out of reciprocal relationships are necessary for Confucian ethics. These include social equilibrium, a rich sense of self-esteem, and reliable expectations concerning the actions of others. Finally, I discuss the difficulties of acting reciprocally in socially disproportional relationships and in those that involve the manifestation of ill will. It is suggested that Confucian ethics provides a viable account of reciprocity that remains relevant for those living in modern contexts. The rules of ritual propriety value reciprocity, If I give a gift and nothing is returned, that is contrary to propriety; If the thing comes to me, and I give nothing in return, that is also contrary to propriety. (Legge, 1885, p. 65)
机译:在本文中,我讨论了互惠在儒家关系伦理学背景下的发展。我讨论了互惠与shu或“同情的理解”的美德之间的关系,然后继续论证,从互惠关系中产生出来的商品对于儒家伦理学是必需的。这些包括社会平衡,丰富的自尊心以及对他人行为的可靠期望。最后,我讨论了在社会不成比例的关系和涉及不良意愿表现的关系中相互行动的困难。建议儒家伦理学提供一种可行的互惠方式,对仍然生活在现代环境中的人们来说仍然是相关的。礼节礼节的原则是互惠,如果我送礼物而没有任何回报,那是与礼节相反的;如果事情降临到我身上,而我却没有给予任何回报,那也违背了礼节。 (莱格,1885年,第65页)

著录项

  • 来源
    《Asian Philosophy》 |2008年第1期|p.35-50|共16页
  • 作者

    Eric C. Mullis;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号