首页> 外文期刊>Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation >The Effects of National Culture on Changes in Management Accounting Systems
【24h】

The Effects of National Culture on Changes in Management Accounting Systems

机译:民族文化对管理会计制度变迁的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study utilises Hofstede's (1980, 1991) framework to investigate the influence of national culture on the volume of management accounting control systems (MACS) changes, and their location, nature and perceived success. We collect data on French manufacturing companies which are comparable with those collected in Canada (Libby & Waterhouse, 1996), Singapore (Williams & Seaman, 2001) and Malaysia (Sulaiman & Mitchell, 2005). We find dramatic differences in MACS changes attributable to cultural differences. A high degree of uncertainty avoidance is reflected in more changes to controlling systems, and individualism and power distance reinforce this result. A high degree of Confucian dynamism is reflected in more changes to planning systems. However, the effect of culture on changes to bonuses is limited. Individualism explains differences in the nature and perceived success of changes. Belonging to a collectivistic culture limits elimination of MACS, while belonging to an individualistic culture increases the likelihood of addition of MACS. Managers in individualistic cultures rate the success of changes more highly than managers in collectivistic cultures. More specifically, managers in individualistic cultures consider they have been most successful in introductions of new techniques while managers in collectivist cultures think they have been most successful in modifications. Other differences are explained by macro-economic factors and similar results are observed in the location and nature of change. This study also enhances examination of the heterogeneous nature of change.
机译:这项研究利用了Hofstede(1980,1991)的框架来研究民族文化对管理会计控制系统(MACS)变更量及其位置,性质和成功感的影响。我们收集的法国制造公司的数据与加拿大(Libby&Waterhouse,1996),新加坡(Williams&Seaman,2001)和马来西亚(Sulaiman&Mitchell,2005)所收集的数据相当。我们发现,由于文化差异,MACS的变化存在巨大差异。控制系统的更多变化反映了高度的不确定性回避,而个人主义和权力距离则加强了这一结果。规划体系的更多变化反映了儒家的高度活力。但是,文化对奖金变化的影响是有限的。个人主义解释了变化的本质和感知成功的差异。属于集体主义文化限制了MACS的消除,而属于个人主义文化则增加了添加MACS的可能性。个人主义文化中的管理者比集体主义文化中的管理者对变革成功的评价更高。更具体地说,个人主义文化的管理者认为他们在引入新技术方面最成功,而集体主义文化的管理者则认为他们在修改方面最成功。其他差异可以用宏观经济因素来解释,在变更的地点和性质上也可以观察到类似的结果。这项研究还增强了对变化的异质性的检验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号