...
首页> 外文期刊>Asia Pacific journal of environmental law >Carbon Trading for Climate Justice?
【24h】

Carbon Trading for Climate Justice?

机译:碳交易为气候正义?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Is carbon trading a just policy response to climate change? To answer this question, I begin by proposing necessary conditions for a just emissions trading scheme. It should lower emissions, and distribute burdens fairly. The Australian carbon trading scheme did not meet these conditions. The trading scheme legislated via the Clean Energy Future reforms included a minimal level of emissions reduction and allowed for heavy use of carbon offsets; and industry compensation has increased the wealth of some of the most emissions-intensive fossil fuel companies. While the carbon price legislation has been repealed, these issues remain relevant. Emissions trading is an established policy preference of government and advising experts and is therefore likely to be revived in the future. In conclusion, I offer a further objection to carbon trading on the basis of inappropriate commodification. We should go beyond technical-ethical moral assessment of the legislation and consider the broader social impact of marketised climate policy in Australia.
机译:碳交易是应对气候变化的公正政策吗?为了回答这个问题,我首先提出一个公正的排放权交易计划的必要条件。它应该降低排放,并公平分配负担。澳大利亚的碳交易计划不符合这些条件。通过“清洁能源未来”改革制定的贸易计划包括最低程度的减排,并允许大量使用碳补偿;行业补偿增加了一些排放最密集的化石燃料公司的财富。尽管碳价格立法已被废除,但这些问题仍然有意义。排放交易是政府和咨询专家的既定政策偏爱,因此将来可能会恢复。最后,我对基于不适当商品化的碳交易提出了进一步的反对意见。我们应该超越对立法的技术伦理道德评估,并考虑澳大利亚市场化气候政策对社会的广泛影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号