首页> 外文期刊>ASHRAE Transactions >Implementation of an Adaptive Occupancy and Building Learning Temperature Setback Algorithm
【24h】

Implementation of an Adaptive Occupancy and Building Learning Temperature Setback Algorithm

机译:自适应占用与建筑物学习温度回落算法的实现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Due to the challenges in predicting the recurring occupancy patterns and the length of nighttime temperature setback to daytime setpoint transition periods in office buildings, operators have been challenged to choose conservatively short temperature setback periods. In recognition of these challenges, a self-adaptive control algorithm that can learn both the recurring occupancy patterns and the parameters of a model predicting the indoor temperature response was implemented in a southwest-facing shared office space in Ottawa, Canada. Results from this implementation indicate that the parameters describing the occupancy, building, and terminal HVAC system characteristics converge to stable andphysically meaningful values in less than two weeks. The control algorithm was also implemented in the energy management system (EMS) application of the building performance simulation (BPS) tool EnergyPlus to adapt the temperature setback schedules of a BPS model of the monitored office. The comfort and annual heating/cooling load implications of 100 different static setback strategies were compared with the adaptive setback periods selected by the control algorithm. Simulation-based results indicate that, with this control algorithm, the frequency of occupant overrides to the thermostat setpoints was the same as it was with a static temperature setback schedule that covers 55% of the year with 15 to 20% lower annual cooling loads and 8 to 10% lower annual heating loads.
机译:由于在预测办公楼中的重复使用模式和夜间温度回落到白天设定点过渡期的长度方面存在挑战,因此运营商面临着选择保守的较短温度回落期的挑战。认识到这些挑战,在加拿大渥太华的一个面向西南的共享办公空间中实现了一种自适应控制算法,该算法可以学习重复的占用模式和预测室内温度响应的模型的参数。此实施的结果表明,描述占用,建筑物和终端HVAC系统特性的参数在不到两周的时间内便收敛到稳定的,具有物理意义的值。该控制算法也已在建筑性能模拟(BPS)工具EnergyPlus的能源管理系统(EMS)应用中实施,以适应受监视办公室的BPS模型的温度挫折时间表。将100种不同静态挫折策略的舒适度和年度供暖/制冷负荷含义与控制算法选择的自适应挫折期进行了比较。基于仿真的结果表明,使用此控制算法,乘员对温控器设定值的覆盖频率与静态温度降级计划的频率相同,该计划每年覆盖55%的年制冷量降低15%至20%,并且每年的供暖负荷降低8%至10%。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ASHRAE Transactions》 |2016年第1期|179-192|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering;

    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada;

    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号