...
首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Intelligence and Law >Mimamsa deontic reasoning using specificity: a proof theoretic approach
【24h】

Mimamsa deontic reasoning using specificity: a proof theoretic approach

机译:使用特异性的Mimamsa故事推理:证明理论方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the course of more than two millennia the philosophical school of Mimamsa has thoroughly analyzed normative statements. In this paper we approach a formalization of the deontic system which is applied but never explicitly discussed in MTmamsa to resolve conflicts between deontic statements by giving preference to the more specific ones. We first extend with prohibitions and recommendations the non-normal deontic logic extracted in Ciabattoni et al. (in: TABLEAUX 2015, volume 9323 of LNCS, Springer, 2015) from MTmamsa texts, obtaining a multimodal dyadic version of the deontic logic MD. Sequent calculus is then used to close a set of prima-facie injunctions under a restricted form of monotonicity, using specificity to avoid conflicts. We establish decidability and complexity results, and investigate the potential use of the resulting system for MTmamsa philosophy and, more generally, for the formal interpretation of normative statements.
机译:在超过两千年的过程中,Mimamsa的哲学学校已经彻底分析了规范性陈述。 在本文中,我们接近应用的文学系统的形式化,但在MTMAMSA中从未明确讨论过,以通过赋予更具体的更偏好来解决故事陈述之间的冲突。 我们首先与禁止和建议延伸,在CIABATTONI等人中提取的非正常性外逻辑。 (in:tableaux 2015,LNCs的第9323卷,Springer,2015)来自MTMAMSA文本,获取了文字的多峰逻辑MD。 然后使用单调的单调性避免冲突的特异性,以避免冲突的局限性,以避免冲突的限制形式,以避免冲突的禁止形式,以缩小一组Prima-Face禁令。 我们建立可译种性和复杂性结果,并调查MTMAMSA哲学所产生的系统的潜在利用,更重要的是,正式解释规范性陈述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号