首页> 外文期刊>Armed Forces & Society >Bringing the Military Back in Political Transition: A Response to Heo and Yun
【24h】

Bringing the Military Back in Political Transition: A Response to Heo and Yun

机译:将军人带入政治过渡:对Heo和Yun的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In August 2012, Armed Forces & Society published an article by Insoo Kim, "Intra-military Divisions and Democratization in South Korea." Uk Heo and Seongyi Yun refuted Kim's argument in their Disputatio Sine Fine response, "Another View on the Relationship between Democratization and Intra-Military Division in South Korea," published in April 2013. In the article, Heo and Yun argued that there was no clear sign of schism in the South Korea military and economic development substantially produced favorable condition for democratization in South Korea. Kim, by contrast, maintains that that the effect of intra-military division on political transition should be incorporated into the explanation of democratization in South Korea because Heo and Yun do not justify their claim that there was no clear evidence of schism in the South Korean military.
机译:2012年8月,武装部队与社会组织发表了Insoo Kim的文章,“韩国军人内部的分裂与民主化”。吴浩和成城Yun在2013年4月发表的金正日的争议中驳斥了金正日的论点,即“关于韩国民主化与军事内部分裂之间关系的另一种观点”。在这篇文章中,浩和argue认为没有论点。韩国出现分裂的明显迹象,军事和经济发展为韩国的民主化创造了有利条件。相比之下,金正日坚持认为,军事内部分裂对政治过渡的影响应纳入对韩国民主化的解释中,因为许和润没有证明他们的主张,即没有明确证据表明韩国存在分裂现象。军事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号