首页> 外文期刊>Argumentation >The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments
【24h】

The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments

机译:顽皮争论的侵略性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some people report that they argue for play. We question whether and how often such arguments are mutually entertaining for both participants. Play is a frame for arguing, and the framing may not always be successful in laminating the eristic nature of interpersonal argumentation. Previous research and theory suggest that playfulness may be associated with aggression. Respondents (N = 199) supplied self-report data on their arguing behaviors and orientations. We found support for the hypothesis that self-reported playfulness and aggression are directly associated. We found less evidence for our hypothesized inverse association between self-reported playfulness and indices of cooperation and avoidance. Self-reports of playfulness are not significantly associated with expert coders’ ratings of either playfulness or aggressiveness. The claim that an argument is playful should be met with skepticism, although playful arguments are possible.
机译:有人报告说他们为比赛辩护。我们质疑这样的论点是否对于双方参与者具有吸引力,以及它们之间有多频繁。游戏是争论的框架,而构架可能并不能总是成功地消除人际论证的过分本质。先前的研究和理论表明,嬉戏可能与攻击性有关。受访者(N = 199)提供了有关其争论行为和方向的自我报告数据。我们发现支持以下假设:自我报告的嬉戏和攻击性直接相关。对于自我报告的嬉戏与合作与回避指数之间的假想反相关,我们发现的证据较少。娱乐性的自我报告与专家编码者对娱乐性或攻击性的评分没有显着相关。尽管争论是可能的,但对论点是好玩的主张应予以怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号