【24h】

The language of typology

机译:类型学的语言

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of typology has recurred in architectural discourse since the term's conception in the early nineteenth century. To describe an architectural object usually involves an act of typifying; a generalisation of built form to common characteristics. Both the analysis of architecture and its creation require this abstraction, which offers the potential to form types and expose initially unapparent relationships. Typology's Enlightenment origins sought to link architecture to a natural order, but its terminology has subsequently been adopted in modernist rejections of mass culture and Neo-Rationalist pursuits of continua and meaning. Despite widespread use of the term, the role typology plays in the process of design remains unclear. Attempts to link its academic origins to the creation of architectural form (notably by Gottfried Semper in the nineteenth century, and Guilio Carlo Argan and Aldo Rossi in the twentieth century) have done little to synthesise the two and merely succeeded in alienating it from practice.
机译:自从19世纪初期开始,“类型学”的概念就出现在建筑界。描述建筑对象通常涉及一种典型的行为。将构建形式概括为通用特征。对架构及其创建的分析都需要这种抽象,它提供了形成类型和暴露最初不明显的关系的潜力。类型学的启蒙起源试图将建筑与自然秩序联系起来,但是其术语随后被大众主义的现代主义拒绝和新理性主义者对连续性和意义的追求所采用。尽管广泛使用该术语,但类型学在设计过程中扮演的角色仍不清楚。尝试将其学术渊源与建筑形式的建立联系起来(特别是19世纪的Gottfried Semper,以及20世纪的Guilio Carlo Argan和Aldo Rossi)对两者的综合没有做任何贡献,只是成功地将其与实践疏远了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号