首页> 外文期刊>Applied Mobilities >The subway as fourth place: anomie, flanerie and the 'crush of persons'
【24h】

The subway as fourth place: anomie, flanerie and the 'crush of persons'

机译:地铁作为第四名:Anomie,Flanerie和'粉碎的人'

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sociologically speaking, what kind of place is the subway? If urbanism is defined as the experience of being surrounded by strangers, then the subway is a quintessentially urban space. But social scientists remain polarized in their views of this space, alternately describing the subway as an antisocial environment, a liminal "non-place", or a space of multicultural contact. In this paper, we describe the social life of the subway, analyzing an original data-set compiled through detailed observations of the behavior of more than 4,000 passengers on the New York City subway system. We use logistic regression to model the factors that influence how passengers direct their gaze and configure their bodies while riding mass transit, and interpret our results with the help of "subway diaries" kept by 18 research subjects over the course of a week. Our findings help to reconcile conflicting images of social interaction in crowded transportation spaces: the subway is a"fourth place": a utilitarian space in which context-specific norms serve to flatten social distinctions, allowing a passive form of social contact constrained by the presence and prevalence of other passengers in the subway car.
机译:社会学上讲,地铁是什么样的地方?如果城市主义被定义为被陌生人包围的经验,那么地铁是一个典型的城市空间。但是,社会科学家在他们对这个空间的看法中仍然是极化的,交替地将地铁描述为反社会环境,纯粹的“不适距”,或多元文化接触的空间。在本文中,我们描述了地铁的社会生活,通过详细观察纽约市地铁系统的4,000多名乘客的行为进行了分析,分析了原始数据集。我们使用Logistic回归来模拟影响乘客如何引导他们的目光的因素,并在乘坐批量转抵时配置他们的身体,并在一周内的18个研究科目保存的“地铁日记”的帮助下解释我们的结果。我们的调查结果有助于将社会互动的互动的图像相互调和,在拥挤的运输空间中:地铁是一个“第四位”:一个功利的空间,其中特定于背景规范用于平整社会区别,允许受到存在的被动形式的社会接触形式地铁车内其他乘客的流行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号