首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Simulation of the influence of flue gas cleaning system on the energetic efficiency of a waste-to-energy plant
【24h】

Simulation of the influence of flue gas cleaning system on the energetic efficiency of a waste-to-energy plant

机译:烟气净化系统对垃圾发电厂能量效率影响的模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Municipal solid waste incinerators are designed to enhance the electrical efficiency obtained by the plant as much as possible. For this reason strong integration between the flue gas cleaning system and the heat recovery system is required. To provide higher electrical efficiencies acid gas neutralization process has the major importance in flue gas cleaning system. At least four technologies are usually applied for acid gas removal: dry neutralization with Ca(OH)_2 or with NaHCO_3, semi-dry neutralization with milk of lime and wet scrubbing. Nowadays, wet scrubbers are rarely used as a result of the large amount of liquid effluents produced; wet scrubbing technology is often applied as a final treatment after a dry neutralization. Operating conditions of the plant were simulated by using Aspen Plus in order to investigate the influences of four different technologies on the electrical efficiency of the plant. The results of the simulations did not show a great influence of the gas cleaning system on the net electrical efficiency, as the difference between the most advantageous technology (neutralization with NaHCO_3) and the worst one, is about 1%.
机译:城市生活垃圾焚烧炉的设计旨在最大程度地提高工厂获得的电效率。因此,需要在烟道气净化系统和热回收系统之间建立牢固的集成。为了提供更高的电效率,酸性气体中和过程在烟气清洁系统中具有重要意义。通常至少采用四种技术去除酸性气体:用Ca(OH)_2或NaHCO_3进行干中和,用石灰乳进行半干中和和湿法洗涤。如今,由于产生大量液体流出物,很少使用湿式洗涤器。干法中和后,通常将湿法洗涤技术用作最终处理。为了研究四种不同技术对工厂电气效率的影响,使用Aspen Plus对工厂的运行条件进行了模拟。模拟结果并未显示气体净化系统对净电效率的重大影响,因为最有利的技术(用NaHCO_3中和)与最差的技术之间的差异约为1%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号