Corrigendum to: Assessment of combined heat and power (CHP) integratedwith wood-based ethanol production [Applied Energy 87 (12) (2010) 3632-3641]

摘要

Unfortunately, there were inaccuracies in Tables 5 and 7, and corrected versions are given below. For the calculations, the higher investment figure shown in the revised Table 5 was used, according to information from the pilot production [20]. The authors also wish to provide complementary information on the cost effectiveness of the different process configurations for CO_2 reductions. Fig. 6 in the article is a comparison of the four options studied, which shows their specific net costs for avoided CO_2 emissions (in SEK/kg). It should be noted that incomes for green electricity certificates have been deducted from these costs, which should therefore be interpreted with caution.