首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >The performance of small scale multi-generation technologies in achieving cost-optimal and zero-energy office building solutions
【24h】

The performance of small scale multi-generation technologies in achieving cost-optimal and zero-energy office building solutions

机译:小规模多代技术在实现成本最优和零能耗的办公楼解决方案中的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the economic viability of small-scale, multi-generation systems (combined heat and power (CHP), combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP)), along with conventional heating and cooling systems combining sixteen heating/cooling energy generation systems (H/C-EGSs). The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EBPD) comparative framework methodology is followed. The local cost-optimal solution for an office building, in Helsinki, Finland is determined for each H/C-EGS as well as the global cost-optimum. The suggested energy efficiency measures get 144 building combinations, and alongside the H/C-EGSs, altogether 2304 cases. The results show that the global cost-optimum belongs to the ground source heat pump with free ground cooling. The investigated biomass-based CHPs are economically viable only with high overall efficiency and low power-to-heat ratio due to both low investment and operational costs. The biomass-based CCHPs do not have economic or environmental benefits over the biomass-based CHPs due to the significant increase entailed of both investment and operational costs. The fossil fuel-based CHPs with high operational costs are the worst solutions economically and environmentally. Extending the cost optimal solutions by a photovoltaic panels system yields the net zero-energy office building with minimum life-cycle costs as well. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究调查了小型多代系统(热电联产(CHP),制冷,供暖和电力联合(CCHP))以及结合十六种供热/制冷能源产生的常规供热和制冷系统的经济可行性系统(H / C-EGSs)。遵循《建筑物能源性能指令》(EBPD)比较框架方法。针对每个H / C-EGS以及全球最佳成本,确定了芬兰赫尔辛基办公楼的本地最佳成本解决方案。建议的能效措施可得到144个建筑组合,以及H / C-EGS,总共2304个案例。结果表明,全球成本最优属于自由地面冷却的地源热泵。受调查的基于生物质的热电联产在经济上仅具有较高的总体效率和较低的电热比,因为其投资和运营成本均较低。基于生物质的CCHP与基于生物质的CHP相比,没有经济或环境效益,原因是投资和运营成本均显着增加。具有高运营成本的基于化石燃料的热电联产在经济和环境方面都是最糟糕的解决方案。通过光伏电池板系统扩展成本最优解决方案,可以产生具有最低生命周期成本的净零能耗办公楼。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号