首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Alternative low-carbon electricity pathways in Switzerland and it's neighbouring countries under a nuclear phase-out scenario
【24h】

Alternative low-carbon electricity pathways in Switzerland and it's neighbouring countries under a nuclear phase-out scenario

机译:核淘汰情景下瑞士及其邻国的替代性低碳电力路径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Switzerland and Europe are currently at a crossroads with respect to its electricity policy. Several existing nuclear and fossil fuel power plants are to be retired in the coming years. Meanwhile, ambitious carbon dioxide (CO2) emission reductions are envisaged, which could penalise fossil power plants and encourage investments in renewable-based electricity generation. Switzerland and a few other countries in Europe have decided to phase-out their nuclear capacity, thereby removing a low-carbon source of electricity in the medium-to long-term future. In order to understand possible electricity transition pathways for Switzerland, electricity supply options for Switzerland and its four neighbouring countries namely Austria, France, Germany and Italy are analysed to assess non-nuclear alternatives under a stringent climate mitigation policy. The cross border Swiss TIMES electricity model (CROSSTEM), a cost optimisation framework with a long time horizon and an hourly temporal resolution, is used for this analysis. In the absence of any CO2 emission reduction targets, gas-based generation supplemented by electricity imports is the cost-effective alternative to nuclear for Switzerland. For a low carbon electricity system, natural gas based generation with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), complemented by an accelerated investment in renewable generation is required. Traditional electricity trade patterns have to be revised, with significant increases in cross-border interconnector capacities necessary to transfer electricity to Switzerland from countries with abundant renewable resources such as Germany and Italy. The average cost of electricity in a decarbonised electricity sector would increase in the range of 30-120% by 2050 compared to today, depending on the scenario assumptions. The availability of CCS technology and the requirement for electricity storage are particularly important to achieve a complete decarbonisation of the electricity sector with a nuclear phase-out. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:瑞士和欧洲目前在电力政策方面正处于十字路口。未来几年,将淘汰几个现有的核能和化石燃料发电厂。同时,设想了雄心勃勃的二氧化碳(CO2)减排措施,这可能会对化石发电厂造成不利影响,并鼓励对可再生能源发电的投资。瑞士和欧洲其他一些国家已决定逐步淘汰其核能,从而在中长期内取消低碳电力。为了了解瑞士可能的电力过渡途径,在严格的减缓气候变化政策下,对瑞士及其四个邻国奥地利,法国,德国和意大利的电力供应选项进行了分析,以评估无核替代品。跨境瑞士TIMES电力模型(CROSSTEM)是一种成本优化框架,具有较长的时间范围和每小时的时间分辨率,用于此分析。在没有任何二氧化碳减排目标的情况下,对于瑞士来说,以天然气为基础的发电加上电力进口是核电的经济有效替代方案。对于低碳电力系统,需要具有碳捕集与封存(CCS)的天然气发电,以及对可再生发电的加速投资。必须修改传统的电力贸易方式,从德国和意大利等可再生资源丰富的国家向瑞士输送电力所必需的跨境互连器容量将大大增加。根据情景假设,到2050年,脱碳电力部门的平均电力成本将增加30-120%。 CCS技术的可用性和电力存储的需求对于通过核淘汰实现电力行业的完全脱碳特别重要。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号