...
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Energy >Productive efficiency in the iron and steel sector under state planning: The case of China and former Czechoslovakia in a comparative perspective
【24h】

Productive efficiency in the iron and steel sector under state planning: The case of China and former Czechoslovakia in a comparative perspective

机译:国家计划下的钢铁部门的生产效率:比较视角下的中国和前捷克斯洛伐克

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

State-ownership has often been discussed as one of the major causes of poor industrial energy efficiency performance. This paper utilizes long-run historical data on the energy and material use in one specific industrial sector - the iron and steel production - in countries with both central-planning and market based system, with a particular focus on former Czechoslovakia paralleled with the developments in China. Czechoslovak productive efficiency of the iron and steel sector fluctuated below the energy efficiency frontier. Until the early 1970s, the country's iron sector was one of the least efficient ones in our sample. It was, however, during the decades of 1970s and 1980s that efficiency measures were adopted and the energy efficiency of the Czechoslovak iron and steel sector increased significantly to, despite of a priori expectations, reach the energy efficiency frontier. Empirical results for other planned economies show similar development of catching-up to the market economies, particularly in the iron production sector during 1980s. A pattern of efficiency convergence was identified. In China, despite its move toward more market oriented economy, the productive efficiency lagged behind as recently as in 2000 (20-35 percent below the efficiency frontier). The relatively late adoption of energy conservation programs and the persistent government control of the sector in certain provinces slowed down the efficiency improvements. In the socialist economies of Eastern Europe, though, central-planners were able to achieve satisfactory productivity increases, primarily driven by efficiency and saving policies and adjustments in existing technology. It is likely, that as was the case of Eastern Europe, the adoption of vigorous energy policies with clearly defined targets accompanied by monitoring and supervision, will have a tremendous impact on the energy intensity as well as the absolute energy use of the sector in China. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:国家所有权经常被讨论为工业能源效率表现不佳的主要原因之一。本文利用了在一个具有中央计划和市场体系的国家中,一个特定工业部门(钢铁生产)中能源和材料使用的长期历史数据,特别关注了前捷克斯洛伐克以及该国的发展。中国。捷克斯洛伐克钢铁部门的生产效率在能源效率前沿以下波动。直到1970年代初,该国的钢铁部门是我们样本中效率最低的部门之一。但是,在1970年代和1980年代的几十年中,采取了能效措施,捷克斯洛伐克钢铁行业的能效有了显着提高,尽管有了先验的期望,却达到了能效前沿。其他计划经济体的经验结果表明,追赶市场经济体的情况类似,特别是在1980年代的钢铁生产领域。确定了效率收敛的模式。在中国,尽管它朝着更加以市场为导向的经济迈进了一步,但生产效率在2000年就已经落后了(比效率前沿低20-35%)。相对较晚采用节能计划以及政府在某些省份对该行业的持续控制减慢了效率的提高。但是,在东欧的社会主义经济体中,中央计划者能够实现令人满意的生产率增长,这主要是由效率和节约政策以及现有技术的调整所驱动的。像东欧一样,采取有明确目标的有力能源政策以及监测和监督措施,将对中国的能源强度和绝对能源使用产生巨大影响。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号