首页> 外文期刊>Applied Cognitive Psychology >Trace-strength and source-monitoring accounts of accuracy and metacognitive resolution in the misinformation paradigm
【24h】

Trace-strength and source-monitoring accounts of accuracy and metacognitive resolution in the misinformation paradigm

机译:在错误信息范式中的准确性和元认知分辨率的痕迹强度和源监视说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two experiments are reported that investigate the impact of misinformation on memory accuracy and metacognitive resolution. In Experiment 1, participants viewed a series of photographs depicting a crime scene, were exposed to misinformation that contradicted details in the slides, and later took a recognition memory test. For each answer, participants were required to indicate whether they were willing to testify (report) their answer to the Court and to rate confidence. Misinformation impaired memory accuracy but it had no effect on resolution, regardless of whether resolution was indexed with confidence-rating measures ( correlation and mean confidence) or a report-option measure (type-2 discrimination: d′). In Experiment 2, a similar accuracy-confidence dissociation was found, and the misinformation effect occurred mostly with fine-grained responses, suggesting that responding was based on recollected details. We argue that the results support source-monitoring (SM) accounts of accuracy and resolution rather than accounts based on trace strength. Copyright ? 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:据报道,有两个实验研究了错误信息对记忆准确性和元认知分辨率的影响。在实验1中,参与者查看了一系列描绘犯罪现场的照片,暴露了与幻灯片中的细节相矛盾的错误信息,然后进行了识别记忆测试。对于每个答案,要求参与者表明他们是否愿意向法院作证(报告)并评价信任度。错误的信息会损害记忆的准确性,但对分辨率没有影响,无论分辨率是使用置信度评估指标(相关性和平均置信度)还是报告选项指标(第二类歧视:d')来确定的。在实验2中,发现了类似的准确性-置信度分离,并且错误信息的影响主要发生在细粒度的响应上,这表明响应是基于重新收集的细节。我们认为结果支持准确性和分辨率的源监视(SM)帐户,而不是基于跟踪强度的帐户。版权? 2010 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号