...
首页> 外文期刊>The Antitrust Bulletin >European Union competition law and policy: how much latitude for convergence with the United States?
【24h】

European Union competition law and policy: how much latitude for convergence with the United States?

机译:欧盟竞争法和竞争政策:与美国融合的自由度是多少?

获取原文
           

摘要

European Union (EU) Competition Commissioner Mario Monti has repeatedly raised the prospect of a convergence of EU competition law toward the substantive standards of American antitrust law. In July 2001, he declared that "the goal of competition policy in all its aspects, is to protect consumer welfare," a formulation remarkably like the stated goal of U.S. antitrust law. Several months later, Monti elaborated that declaration, stating that "US-EU convergence is a key building bloc for a multilateral co-operation in antitrust ..." Monti concluded that "the EU and US agencies have, in spite of the different legal instruments at our disposal, been using the same micro-economic analytical tools, and increasingly so in recent years." In June 2002, he raised the question of whether the Merger Regulation should embrace an efficiencies defense. In November 2002, Monti endorsed an efficiencies defense. In that same speech, he endorsed the continued use of a "dominance" test for evaluating mergers (and thus rejected proposals to switch to the "substantially lessening of competition" test of the Clayton Act), but contended that the dominance test as used in the Merger Regulation and the Clayton Act test produce broadly convergent outcomes. His complete remarks imply that there has been a strong U.S. influence on EU policy over the period of its development, that U.S. antitrust policy has been following a "consumer welfare" standard, and that the EU is about to embrace that standard. U.S. Deputy Assistant Attorney General William Kolasky has attributed great importance to Monti's remarks. Kolasky also has asserted a growing convergence between EU and American antitrust policies, as Europe moves closer toward an efficiency-based "consumer welfare" policy. In this article we consider the feasibility of an EU movement toward convergence by exploring the apparent purposes of EU policy and the constraints that may limit change. Comparing and contrasting present European competition policy with the situation across the Atlantic best illuminates the potential for change.
机译:欧盟竞争专员马里奥·蒙蒂(Mario Monti)反复提出了使欧盟竞争法趋向于美国反托拉斯法的实质性标准的前景。 2001年7月,他宣布“竞争政策的所有方面的目标都是保护消费者的福祉”,这一提法非常类似于美国反托拉斯法规定的目标。几个月后,蒙蒂阐述了该声明,指出“美欧融合是反托拉斯多边合作的关键建设集团……”蒙蒂总结说:“尽管法律不同,欧盟和美国机构还是有我们可以使用的工具一直使用相同的微观经济分析工具,并且近年来越来越多。”在2002年6月,他提出了一个问题,即《合并条例》是否应包括对效率的辩护。 2002年11月,蒙蒂(Monti)批准了效率防御。在同一讲话中,他赞同继续使用“优势”测试来评估合并(因此拒绝了改用《克莱顿法案》的“显着减少竞争”测试的提议),但他主张《合并条例》和《克莱顿法案》的检验产生了广泛趋同的结果。他的完整话暗示,在其发展时期,美国对欧盟政策产生了重大影响,美国的反托拉斯政策一直遵循“消费者福利”标准,欧盟即将接受该标准。美国副检察总长威廉·科拉斯基(William Kolasky)高度重视蒙蒂的讲话。随着欧洲向基于效率的“消费者福利”政策靠拢,科拉斯基还断言欧盟和美国的反托拉斯政策之间的融合将越来越紧密。在本文中,我们通过探讨欧盟政策的明显目的以及可能限制变革的制约因素,来考虑欧盟走向融合的可行性。将当前的欧洲竞争政策与大西洋沿岸的形势进行比较和对比,可以最好地说明变革的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号