...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Production Science >Effectiveness of grazing and herbicide treatments for lucerne removal before cropping in southern New South Wales
【24h】

Effectiveness of grazing and herbicide treatments for lucerne removal before cropping in southern New South Wales

机译:在新南威尔士州南部放牧前除草和除草剂处理去除卢塞恩的效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The difficulty of reliably removing an established lucerne pasture before cropping has been identified as a major problem with phase-farming systems on mixed farms. A series of experiments were undertaken on established lucerne stands at the Ginninderra Experimental Station in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and at the Temora Research Station in southern New South Wales (NSW) to compare the ability of grazing, either alone or in combination with herbicides, to remove a lucerne pasture. A pilot study at the Ginninderra Experimental Station in 1998–99 utilised a high stocking rate (30 dry sheep equivalents [dse]/ha), while the main study at the Ginninderra Experimental Station and the Temora Research Station in 1999–2000 used a lower stocking rate (10–12 dse/ha) considered to be closer to farmer practice in the region. Continuous grazing at the high stocking rate removed 73% of the lucerne stand over 3 months. In contrast, the stocking rates applied in the main study proved too low to substantially impact on lucerne survival at both the ACT and NSW sites (13–23% removal) under the good seasonal conditions experienced in 1999–2000 even though the pastures were continuously grazed for 8–9 months. The use of herbicides both alone or in conjunction with grazing greatly improved lucerne removal in both studies. However, herbicide efficacy was variable (53–100% removal), and seemed to be related to the time of year it was applied, the period of lucerne regrowth or the amount of rainfall before herbicide application.nnAn additional on-farm study was undertaken near Junee Reefs in southern NSW between 2001 and 2003 that compared the survival of a range of lucerne cultivars under simulated hay-cutting (mown) and commercial grazing regimes. Dry conditions during 2002–03 resulted in a decline in lucerne frequency at about 50% in mown control plots. Grazing increased the stand decline, particularly for many winter-active cultivars where lucerne frequency was reduced by up to 70–93%.nnIt was concluded that: (i) continuous grazing for prolonged periods can be effective at removing lucerne, but the rate of lucerne loss will be influenced by both stocking rate and rainfall; (ii) the application of herbicides can improve lucerne removal either in association with, or in the absence of grazing; however, herbicide efficacy appeared to be dependent upon the physiological status of the lucerne plants and/or the environmental conditions before application; and (iii) cultivar responses indicated that lucerne types could potentially be developed for phase-farming systems with increased susceptibility to grazing mismanagement.
机译:种植前难以可靠地切除已建立的卢塞恩草场是混合农场分阶段养殖系统的主要问题。在澳大利亚首都领地(ACT)的Ginninderra实验站和新南威尔士州南部的Temora研究站(NSW)的已建立的卢塞恩架子上进行了一系列实验,比较了单独或与之相结合的放牧能力除草剂,以去除琉森草场。 1998–99年在Ginninderra实验站进行的试点研究使用了较高的放养率(30干燥羊当量[dse] / ha),而1999–2000年在Ginninderra实验站和Temora研究站进行的主要研究则采用了较低的放养率。放牧率(10-12 dse / ha)被认为更接近该地区的农民实践。在高放养率下持续放牧在3个月内清除了73%的卢塞恩。相反,在主要研究中使用的放养率证明过低,即使在牧场持续不断的情况下,在1999-2000年经历的良好季节性条件下,ACT和新南威尔士州的苜蓿存活率(去除率13-23%)也无法得到实质性影响吃草8–9个月。在两项研究中,单独使用除草剂或与放牧一起使用除草剂都大大改善了卢塞恩的去除。但是,除草剂的功效是可变的(53-100%的去除率),似乎与施药的时间,卢塞恩再生长的时期或除草剂施用前的降雨量有关。在2001年至2003年之间,位于新南威尔士州南部朱尼礁附近,比较了一系列卢塞恩品种在模拟割草(割成)和商业放牧制度下的生存情况。在2002-03年间的干旱条件下,割制的对照地块中的卢塞恩频率下降了约50%。放牧加剧了林分的下降,特别是对于许多冬季活跃的品种,这些品种的苜蓿频率降低了多达70-93%。nn结论:(i)长时间连续放牧可以有效地去除苜蓿,但是卢塞恩的损失将受到放养率和降雨的影响; (ii)施用除草剂可改善或不伴随放牧而促进的卢塞恩去除;但是,除草剂的功效似乎取决于卢塞恩植物的生理状况和/或施用前的环境条件。 (iii)品种响应表明,对于放牧管理不善的易感性较高的阶段农业系统,可能会开发出苜蓿类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号