...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Political Science >The Freedom of Desire: Hegel's Response to Rousseau on the Problem of Civil Society
【24h】

The Freedom of Desire: Hegel's Response to Rousseau on the Problem of Civil Society

机译:欲望的自由:黑格尔对卢梭在民间社会问题上的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ever-growing body of literature on civil society can benefit from a return to the original theoretical articulation and defense of the concept in the work of G.W.F. Hegel. Specifically, this article suggests that Jean-Jacques Rousseau's influential critique of civil society remains unanswered and argues that Hegel responded with a sweeping and sympathetic institutional design that remains relevant today. Hegel agrees with Rousseau that commercial society aggravates the dissatisfaction of its members, and that educating individual desire through institutional design is necessary to solve this difficulty. However, modern states need not adopt Rousseau's extreme and impracticable solution. Hegel's concrete, market-based associations of civil society render desires satiable and elevate them to accord with the common good, while still maintaining the freedom and distinctness of a pluralistic modern society.
机译:在G.W.F.的工作中,不断壮大的民间社会文学可以从对这一概念的原始理论阐述和辩护中受益。黑格尔。具体而言,本文提出让·雅克·卢梭对公民社会的有影响力的批评仍未得到解答,并辩称黑格尔以宽泛而富有同情心的制度设计作为回应,这一制度设计在今天仍然有用。黑格尔同意卢梭的观点,即商业社会加剧了其成员的不满,通过制度设计来教育个人的欲望对于解决这一困难是必要的。但是,现代国家不必采用卢梭的极端和不切实际的解决方案。黑格尔以公民为基础的具体的,以市场为基础的协会使人们的欲望得以满足,并使它们与共同利益相一致,同时仍保持着多元化现代社会的自由和独特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号