首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >The Social, Spatial, and Economic Roots of Urban Inequality in Africa: Contextualizing Jane Jacobs and Henry George
【24h】

The Social, Spatial, and Economic Roots of Urban Inequality in Africa: Contextualizing Jane Jacobs and Henry George

机译:非洲城市不平等的社会,空间和经济根源:简·雅各布斯和亨利·乔治的背景信息化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unravelling the social and economic roots of urban inequality in Africa has remained a thorny issue in African political economy. Stripped to its bare essentials, the critical questions are who causes urban inequality, what causes it, and how it is caused? While all different, the questions are interrelated. Answering the who causes inequality question requires a related analysis of what and why, and that is connected to the how question. Indeed, the how question has two partshow inequality is caused and how it can be addressed. Both are connected to the why question and to its resolution. Unfortunately, while studies about urban inequality abound, they tend to hive off one aspect or another of the tripartite questions on inequality and, even worse, they study the three questions separately. This article tries to overcome the existing atomistic and piecemeal approach to the study of urban inequality in Africa by contextualizing the work of Jane Jacobs and Henry George, who took a holistic view of urban inequality. It argues that Jacobsianism and Georgism have much to offer in terms of understanding urban inequality in Africa, but neither analysis goes far enough to be able to serve as a solid foundation for policy. Ultimately, it is in their approach to urban analysisthe emphasis on context, on actual urban problems, inductivism, and some of their mechanisms for change such as George's land tax and cautious abstraction, in that order, along with their combined visionwhich I call diversity in equalitythat can add to the insights of postcolonialism in understanding and transforming urban inequality in Africa.
机译:弄清非洲城市不平等的社会和经济根源仍然是非洲政治经济中一个棘手的问题。撇开其基本要点,关键问题是谁造成了城市不平等,什么原因造成了城市不平等,以及它是如何引起的?尽管各不相同,但这些问题是相互关联的。要回答导致不平等问题的原因,就需要对原因和原因进行相关分析,而这与问题如何有关。确实,问题如何由两部分组成,表明了不平等的产生以及如何解决。两者都与“为什么”问题及其解决方案有关。不幸的是,尽管关于城市不平等的研究比比皆是,但它们往往使关于不平等的三方问题中的一个方面或另一个方面陷入困境,更糟糕的是,他们分别研究了三个问题。本文试图通过对简·雅各布斯和亨利·乔治的工作进行情境化,从而克服现有的原子和零散的非洲城市不平等研究方法,后者对城市不平等问题采取了整体看法。它认为,雅各布斯主义和乔治主义在理解非洲城市不平等方面可以提供许多帮助,但没有哪一项分析足以为政策奠定坚实基础。最终,正是在他们进行城市分析的方法中,重点放在了背景,实际的城市问题,归纳主义以及他们的一些变革机制上,例如乔治的地税和谨慎的抽象,以及他们的共同愿景,我称之为多样性。平等可以增加后殖民主义在理解和改变非洲城市不平等方面的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号