首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >On A Political Solution to the NIMBY Conflict
【24h】

On A Political Solution to the NIMBY Conflict

机译:政治解决宁贝冲突的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Scale economy in the construction and operation of public facilities, such as landfills, calls for cooperation among communities to build a common facility (Arthur O'Sullivan, 1993). Such a facility is a mixture of a public good and a private bad and, hence, leads to strong opposition by communities to locate it in their vicinity (Bruno S. Frey et al., 1996). This is one of the most serious environmental concerns of recent years, and is known as NIMBY: "not in my backyard." In this paper we study the hypothesis that a democratic political process creates an adequate mechanism for the resolution of the NIMBY conflict. The intuitive explanation is simple. A NIMBY conflict is likely to induce lobbying and symmetric pressures by all threatened communities in the relevant region. As is well known (Gene M. Grossman and Elhanan Helpman, 1994), when subject to symmetric pressures, politicians stick firmly to principles and function most efficiently.
机译:在建设和运营垃圾填埋场等公共设施时,要实现规模经济,就需要社区之间合作以建立一个公共设施(Arthur O'Sullivan,1993)。这种设施是公共物品和私人物品的混合体,因此导致社区强烈反对将其放置在附近(Bruno S. Frey等人,1996)。这是近年来最严重的环境问题之一,被称为NIMBY:“不在我家后院”。在本文中,我们研究了以下假设:民主政治进程为解决NIMBY冲突创造了适当的机制。直观的解释很简单。一个灵活的冲突很可能引起相关地区所有受威胁社区的游说和对称压力。众所周知(Gene M. Grossman和Elhanan Helpman,1994),当受到对称压力时,政客坚定地坚持原则并最有效地发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号