首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >N.J.'S TOP COURT WON'T ROLL BACK CONDUCT RULE'S ADR IMPACT
【24h】

N.J.'S TOP COURT WON'T ROLL BACK CONDUCT RULE'S ADR IMPACT

机译:新泽西州的最高法院不会撤销对行为准则的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The New Jersey Supreme Court has declined to roll back its local version of Rule of Professional Conduct Rule 5.5, on multi-jurisdictional practice, despite a recommendation by its own professional responsibility rules committee to amend it to exclude alternative dispute resolution matters. The result is that non-New Jersey practitioners are still required to register with the state when participating in ADR matters, or enlist local counsel, in the wake of a 2007 opinion by another Court committee. That opinion appears to require unadmitted corporate attorney-representatives to register, pro hac vice-style, when involved in New Jersey arbitrations, mediations, and even negotiations. At a minimum, the requirement is an inconvenience for general counsel and corporate officials with law licenses elsewhere. For the ADR hardcore, it runs counter to strongly held beliefs that parties determine their future at the bargaining table, and, accordingly, should be able to determine who their representative is.
机译:尽管其自己的职业责任规则委员会建议对其进行修订,以排除其他解决争端的事项,但新泽西州最高法院拒绝就多管辖区实践撤销其本地版本的《专业行为规则》第5.5条。结果是,在另一个法院委员会于2007年发表意见之后,参与非诉讼纠纷解决事务的非新泽西州执业者仍需在该州注册,或征募当地律师。该意见似乎要求未经许可的公司律师代表在参与新泽西州的仲裁,调解甚至谈判时,以副主席的身份进行注册。最低要求是,对于在其他地方具有法律许可的总法律顾问和公司官员而言,这带来了不便。对于ADR的核心人物,它与坚定的信念相反,即各方在谈判桌上决定自己的未来,因此应该能够确定其代表是谁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号