首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >CALIFORNIA'S TOP COURT: THIS ISN'T HALL STREET, SO JUDICIAL REVIEW IS OK
【24h】

CALIFORNIA'S TOP COURT: THIS ISN'T HALL STREET, SO JUDICIAL REVIEW IS OK

机译:加利福尼亚的顶级法院:这不是霍尔街,因此可以进行司法复审

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

That was fast. While the U.S. Supreme Court left only a sliver of a legal basis that potentially would allow parties to contract for heightened arbitration award judicial review in its March Hall Street Associates decision, an influential state supreme court has wasted no time in defining a loophole and ruling that parties can allow their awards to be reviewed in courts via a contract provision.
机译:那太快了。尽管美国最高法院只保留了很小一部分法律依据,可能会允许当事方在其March Hall Street Associates的判决中就加强仲裁裁决的司法审查订立合同,但颇具影响力的州最高法院却没有浪费时间来界定漏洞并做出裁决。当事人可以通过合同条款允许其裁决在法院进行审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号