首页> 外文期刊>The Air Force Law Review >THIS LAND IS MY LAND: THE TENSION BETWEEN FEDERAL USE OF PUBLIC LANDS AND THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT
【24h】

THIS LAND IS MY LAND: THE TENSION BETWEEN FEDERAL USE OF PUBLIC LANDS AND THE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACT

机译:这片土地就是我的土地:联邦对联邦土地的使用与宗教自由恢复法案之间的紧张关系

获取原文
           

摘要

An objective review of RFRA's history, the problems Congress was trying to address and the ensuing litigation indicate RFRA should not apply to government decisions with respect to the use of public lands. The most straightforward, but politically untenable, way to keep RFRA out of public land management would be to repeal the Act in its entirety. The Act has engendered a great deal of litigation, created a vague legal landscape, undermined public health and welfare laws such as the Controlled Substances Act and even interfered with military readiness. Successful RFRA suits result in discriminatory outcomes by granting religious practitioners privileges denied to non-practitioners and exemptions from laws non-practitioners must follow.
机译:客观回顾RFRA的历史,国会试图解决的问题以及随后的诉讼表明RFRA不应适用于政府在使用公共土地方面的决策。使RFRA脱离公共土地管理的最直接但在政治上站不住脚的方法是全面废除该法案。该法案引发了大量诉讼,造成了模糊的法律环境,破坏了诸如《受控物质法案》之类的公共卫生和福利法律,甚至干扰了军事准备。成功的RFRA诉讼通过向宗教从业者授予非从业者特权,并赋予非从业者必须遵循的法律豁免权,从而导致歧视性结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号