首页> 外文期刊>AI & society >Comparative legal study on privacy and personal data protection for robots equipped with artificial intelligence: looking at functional and technological aspects
【24h】

Comparative legal study on privacy and personal data protection for robots equipped with artificial intelligence: looking at functional and technological aspects

机译:配备人工智能的机器人的隐私和个人数据保护的比较法律研究:研究功能和技术方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper undertakes a comparative legal study to analyze the challenges of privacy and personal data protection posed by Artificial Intelligence ("AI") embedded in Robots, and to offer policy suggestions. After identifying the benefits from various AI usages and the risks posed by AI-related technologies, I then analyze legal frameworks and relevant discussions in the EU, USA, Canada, and Japan, and further consider the efforts of Privacy by Design ("PbD") originating in Ontario, Canada. While various AI usages provide great convenience, many issues, including profiling, discriminatory decisions, lack of transparency, and impeding consent, have emerged. The unpredictability arising from the AI machine learning function poses further difficulties, which have only been partially addressed by legal frameworks in the aforementioned jurisdictions. However, analyzing the relevant discussions yielded several suggestions. The first priority is adopting PbD as the most flexible, soft-legal, and preferable approach toward AI-oriented issues. Implementing PbD will protect individual privacy and personal data without specific efforts, and achieve both the development of AI and the advancement of privacy and personal data protection. Technical measures that can adapt to an individual's dynamic choices according to the "context" should be further developed. Furthermore, alternative technical measures, including those to solve the "algorithmic black box" or achieve differential privacy, warrant thorough examination. If AI surpasses human intelligence, a terminating function, such as a "kill switch" will be the last resort to preserve individual choice. Despite numerous difficulties, we must prepare for the coming AI-prevalent society by taking a flexible approach.
机译:本文进行了比较法律研究,以分析嵌入在机器人中的人工智能(“ AI”)对隐私和个人数据保护的挑战,并提供政策建议。在确定了各种AI使用带来的好处以及AI相关技术带来的风险之后,我将分析欧盟,美国,加拿大和日本的法律框架和相关讨论,并进一步考虑“设计隐私”(“ PbD “)起源于加拿大安大略省。尽管各种AI用法都提供了极大的便利,但已经出现了许多问题,包括概要分析,歧视性决策,缺乏透明性和阻碍同意。由AI机器学习功能引起的不可预测性带来了进一步的困难,上述管辖区中的法律框架仅部分解决了这些困难。但是,分析相关讨论得出了一些建议。首要任务是采用PbD作为针对AI问题的最灵活,合法的,可取的方法。实施PbD将无需任何特殊努力即可保护个人隐私和个人数据,并实现AI的发展以及隐私和个人数据保护的发展。应根据“上下文”适应个人动态选择的技术措施应进一步开发。此外,其他技术措施,包括解决“算法黑匣子”或实现差异性隐私的技术措施,也需要进行彻底检查。如果AI超越了人类的智慧,则终止功能(例如“ kill switch”)将是保留个人选择的最后手段。尽管有许多困难,我们必须采取灵活的方法为即将到来的AI流行社会做准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号