首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis and Prevention >Sensitivity and specificity of the driver sleepiness detection methods using physiological signals: A systematic review
【24h】

Sensitivity and specificity of the driver sleepiness detection methods using physiological signals: A systematic review

机译:使用生理信号的驾驶睡眠检测方法的敏感性和特异性:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Driver sleepiness is a major contributor to road crashes. A system that monitors and warns the driver at a certain, critical level of arousal, could aid in reducing sleep-related crashes. To determine how driver sleepiness detection systems perform, a systematic review of the sensitivity and specificity outcomes was performed. In total, 21 studies were located that met inclusion criteria for the review. The range of sensitivity outcomes was between 39.0-98.8 % and between 73.0-98.9 % for specificity outcomes. There was considerable variation in the outcomes of the studies employing only one physiological measure (mono-signal approach), whereas, a poly-signal approach with multiple physiological signals resulted in more consistency with higher outcomes on both sensitivity and specificity metrics. Only six of the 21 studies had both sensitivity and specificity outcomes above 90.0 %, which included monoand poly-signal approaches. Moreover, increases in the number of features used in the sleepiness detection system did not result in higher sensitivity and specificity outcomes. Overall, there was considerable variability between the studies reviewed, including measures of ground truth, the features employed and the machine learning approach of the systems. A critical need for progressing any system is a revalidation of the system on a new sample of users. These aspects indicate considerable progress is needed with physiological-based driver sleepiness systems before they are at a sufficient standard to be deployed on-road.
机译:司机嗜睡是道路崩溃的主要贡献者。在某个临界唤醒水平的系统中监控和警告驾驶员的系统可以帮助减少与睡眠相关的崩溃。为了确定驾驶员嗜睡检测系统的表现,进行了对敏感性和特异性结果的系统审查。总共有21项研究,符合审查的纳入标准。特异性结果的敏感性结果范围介于39.0-98.8%和73.0-98.9%之间。在仅使用一种生理测量(单信号方法)的研究结果中存在相当大的变化,而具有多种生理信号的多信号方法导致敏感度和特异性度量的更高结果更加一致。 21项研究中只有六种敏感性和特异性结果在90.0%以上,其中包括单声道多信号方法。此外,睡眠检测系统中使用的特征数量的增加不会导致更高的灵敏度和特异性结果。总体而言,在研究的研究之间存在相当大的变化,包括地面真理的措施,所用的功能和系统的机器学习方法。对进展任何系统的关键需求是对系统的新用户样本的重新验证。这些方面表明,在足够的标准之前,基于生理的驾驶员嗜睡系统需要相当大的进展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accident Analysis and Prevention》 |2021年第2期|105900.1-105900.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Queensland Univ Technol QUT Ctr Accid Res & Rd Safety Queensland CARRS Q Brisbane Qld Australia|Queensland Univ Technol QUT Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat IHBI Brisbane Qld Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol QUT Ctr Accid Res & Rd Safety Queensland CARRS Q Brisbane Qld Australia|Queensland Univ Technol QUT Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat IHBI Brisbane Qld Australia;

    Queensland Univ Technol QUT Ctr Accid Res & Rd Safety Queensland CARRS Q Brisbane Qld Australia|Queensland Univ Technol QUT Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat IHBI Brisbane Qld Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Fatigue; Drowsiness; Driving; Features; Machine learning; Ground truth; Physiological sleepiness;

    机译:疲劳;嗜睡;驾驶;特征;机器学习;地面真理;生理嗜睡;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号