...
首页> 外文期刊>Academy of management learning & education >REPAIRING LEAKS IN THE PIPELINE: A SOCIAL CLOSURE PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERREPRESENTED RACIAL/ETHNIC MINORITY RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS
【24h】

REPAIRING LEAKS IN THE PIPELINE: A SOCIAL CLOSURE PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERREPRESENTED RACIAL/ETHNIC MINORITY RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION IN BUSINESS SCHOOLS

机译:修复管道中的泄漏:对不受欢迎的种族/族裔少数人才的招募和保留在企业中的社会关怀

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite initiatives to diversify business school administration, faculty, and doctoral student bodies, challenges to the recruitment and retention of underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities (URMs) persist. A "leaky pipeline" metaphor is often leveraged to describe these challenges, whereby disproportionately few racial/ethnic minorities initially "enter" the pipeline (i.e., academic career), and this initially low supply dwindles ("leaks") at more advanced stages of the pipeline. Beyond simply describing leaks in the business school pipeline, we seek to explain why leaks occur and how they can be repaired. Specifically, we contend that mechanisms of social closure-discriminatory evaluation, knowledge-and resource-hoarding, and the preservation of dominant group identities-not only restrict URMs' access to the academic pipeline, but also contribute its "leaks." After discussing these mechanisms, we conclude with recommendations to the AACSB, an institution that can facilitate change and reduce social closure within business schools.
机译:尽管采取了使商学院管理,教职员工和博士生机构多样化的举措,但对于招募和保留代表性不足的种族/族裔少数群体(URM)的挑战仍然存在。通常用“泄漏管道”的比喻来描述这些挑战,由此,少数种族/族裔少数人最初“进入”管道(即,学术职业),而最初的供应不足则在较低的阶段逐渐减少(“泄漏”)。管道。除了简单描述商学院管道中的泄漏之外,我们还试图解释泄漏发生的原因以及如何修复泄漏。具体而言,我们认为社会封闭机制,歧视性评估,知识和资源ho积以及优势群体身份的保留不仅限制了URM进入学术渠道,而且也为其“泄漏”做出了贡献。在讨论了这些机制之后,我们最后向AACSB提出了建议,AACSB是一个可以促进变革并减少商学院内部社会封闭的机构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号