...
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Emergency Medicine >Duty Hours in Emergency Medicine: Balancing Patient Safety, Resident Wellness, and the Resident Training Experience: A Consensus Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Resident Duty Hours Recommendations
【24h】

Duty Hours in Emergency Medicine: Balancing Patient Safety, Resident Wellness, and the Resident Training Experience: A Consensus Response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine Resident Duty Hours Recommendations

机译:急诊医学工作时间:平衡患者安全,住院病人健康和住院医生培训经验:对2008年美国医学会住院医师工作时间建议的共识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Representatives of emergency medicine (EM) were asked to develop a consensus report that provided a review of the past and potential future effects of duty hour requirements for EM residency training. In addition to the restrictions made in 2003 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the potential effects of the 2008 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on resident duty hours were postulated. The elements highlighted include patient safety, resident wellness, and the resident training experience. Many of the changes and recommendations did not affect EM as significantly as other specialties. Current training standards in EM have already emphasized patient safety by requiring continuous on-site supervision of residents. Resident fatigue has been addressed with restrictions of shift lengths and limitation of consecutive days worked. One recommendation from the IOM was a required 5-hour rest period for residents on call. Emergency department (ED) patient safety becomes an important concern with the decrease in the availability and in the patient load of a resident consultant that may result from this recommendation. Of greater concern is the already observed slower throughput time for admitted patients waiting for resident care, which will increase ED crowding and decrease patient safety in academic institutions. A balance between being overly prescriptive with duty hour restrictions and trying to improve resident wellness was recommended. Discussion is included regarding the appropriate length of EM training programs if clinical experiences were limited by new duty hour regulations. Finally, this report presents a review of the financing issues associated with any changes.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1004–1011 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
机译:急诊医学(EM)的代表被要求制定一份共识报告,该报告回顾了EM住院医师培训工作时间要求的过去和未来的潜在影响。除了2003年研究生医学教育认可委员会(ACGME)做出的限制外,还假定了2008年医学研究所(IOM)报告对居民工作时间的潜在影响。强调的要素包括患者安全性,住院医师的健康状况以及住院医师的培训经验。许多更改和建议对EM的影响不如其他专业显着。 EM中当前的培训标准已经通过要求对居民进行持续的现场监督来强调患者的安全。通过轮班时间的限制和连续工作天数的限制来解决居民疲劳。 IOM的一项建议是要求待命居民有5个小时的休息时间。急诊科(ED)患者的安全成为该建议可能导致住院顾问的可用性下降和患者负担下降的重要问题。更令人担忧的是,已经观察到等待住院治疗的住院患者的吞吐时间较慢,这将增加ED拥挤并降低学术机构的患者安全性。建议在规定过多的工作时间和限制居民健康之间取得平衡。如果临床经验受到新工作时间规定的限制,则将讨论有关EM培训计划的适当时长。最后,本报告对与任何变更相关的融资问题进行了回顾。ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1004–1011©2010年学术急诊医学协会

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号