首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Natural gas and CO2 price variation: impact on the relative cost-efficiency of LNG and pipelines
【2h】

Natural gas and CO2 price variation: impact on the relative cost-efficiency of LNG and pipelines

机译:天然气和二氧化碳价格变化:对液化天然气和管道相对成本效率的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article develops a formal model for comparing the cost structure of the two main transport options for natural gas: liquefied natural gas (LNG) and pipelines. In particular, it evaluates how variations in the prices of natural gas and greenhouse gas emissions affect the relative cost-efficiency of these two options. Natural gas is often promoted as the most environmentally friendly of all fossil fuels, and LNG as a modern and efficient way of transporting it. Some research has been carried out into the local environmental impact of LNG facilities, but almost none into aspects related to climate change. This paper concludes that at current price levels for natural gas and CO2 emissions the distance from field to consumer and the volume of natural gas transported are the main determinants of transport costs. The pricing of natural gas and greenhouse emissions influence the relative cost-efficiency of LNG and pipeline transport, but only to a limited degree at current price levels. Because more energy is required for the LNG process (especially for fuelling the liquefaction process) than for pipelines at distances below 9100 km, LNG is more exposed to variability in the price of natural gas and greenhouse gas emissions up to this distance. If the prices of natural gas and/or greenhouse gas emission rise dramatically in the future, this will affect the choice between pipelines and LNG. Such a price increase will be favourable for pipelines relative to LNG.
机译:本文开发了一个正式的模型,用于比较两种主要的天然气运输方式:液化天然气(LNG)和管道的成本结构。特别是,它评估了天然气价格和温室气体排放价格的变化如何影响这两种选择的相对成本效率。天然气通常被提倡为所有化石燃料中最环保的燃料,而液化天然气则为现代高效的运输方式。已经对液化天然气设施对当地环境的影响进行了一些研究,但对与气候变化有关的方面几乎没有研究。本文得出的结论是,在当前天然气和CO2排放的价格水平上,从田野到消费者的距离和运输的天然气量是运输成本的主要决定因素。天然气和温室气体的定价影响液化天然气和管道运输的相对成本效率,但在目前的价格水平上仅在一定程度上受到影响。由于LNG工艺(尤其是为液化工艺提供燃料)比9100 km以下距离的管线需要更多的能源,因此LNG在此价格范围内的天然气和温室气体排放价格变化更大。如果将来天然气和/或温室气体排放的价格急剧上升,这将影响管道和液化天然气之间的选择。相对于液化天然气,这种价格上涨将对管道有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号