首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Stroke Research and Treatment >Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Methods of Recanalization in a Model of the Middle Cerebral Artery: Thrombus Aspiration via a 4F Catheter, Thrombus Aspiration via the GP Thromboaspiration Device, and Mechanical Thrombectomy Using the Solitaire Thrombectomy Device
【2h】

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Methods of Recanalization in a Model of the Middle Cerebral Artery: Thrombus Aspiration via a 4F Catheter, Thrombus Aspiration via the GP Thromboaspiration Device, and Mechanical Thrombectomy Using the Solitaire Thrombectomy Device

机译:比较中脑动脉模型中三种再通方法的有效性:通过4F导管进行血栓抽吸,通过GP血栓抽吸装置进行血栓抽吸以及使用单人血栓切除术的机械血栓切除术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction. This paper compares different approaches to recanalization in a model of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Methods. An occlusive thrombus (lamb's blood) was introduced into the MCA of a model of the cerebral circulation perfused with Hartmann's solution (80 pulsations/min, mean pressure 90 mm Hg). Three methods of clot retrieval were tested: thrombus aspiration via a 4F catheter (n = 26), thrombus aspiration via the GP thrombus aspiration device (GPTAD) (n = 30), and mechanical thrombectomy via the Solitaire Device (n = 30). Results. Recanalization rate was similar for all 3 approaches (62%, 77%, and 85%). Time to recanalization was faster with aspiration devices (41 SD 42 s for 4F and 61 SD 21 s for GPTAD) than with the Solitaire (197 SD 64 s P < .05 Kruksal-Wallis). Clot fragmentation was the same in the Solitaire (23%) and the GPTAD (23%), but higher with the 4F (53%, P < .05). Conclusion. In this model, thrombus aspiration was faster than mechanical thrombectomy, and similarly effective at recanalization. These results should be confirmed in vivo.
机译:介绍。本文比较了大脑中动脉(MCA)模型中再通的不同方法。方法。将闭塞性血栓(羔羊血)引入用Hartmann溶液(80脉动/分钟,平均压力90 mm Hg)灌注的脑循环模型的MCA中。测试了三种凝结物恢复方法:通过4F导管进行血栓抽吸(n = 26),通过GP血栓抽吸装置(GPTAD)进行血栓抽吸(n = 30),以及通过纸牌设备进行机械血栓切除术(n = 30)。结果。所有三种方法的再通率均相似(62%,77%和85%)。吸气装置(4F为41 SD 42 s,GPTAD为61 SD 21 s)的再通时间比单纸纸(197 SD 64 s P <.05 Kruksal-Wallis)要快。纸牌(23%)和GPTAD(23%)的凝块碎片相同,但4F碎片更高(53%,P <.05)。结论。在该模型中,血栓抽吸比机械血栓切除术更快,并且在再通方面同样有效。这些结果应在体内得到证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号