首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SQU Journal for Scientific Research - Medical Sciences >Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents:
【2h】

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents:

机译:儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍评估和诊断的临床实践指南:

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article presents a comprehensive review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the evaluation and/or diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents. A systematic review was undertaken to summarise the recommendations reported in CPGs. MEDLINE® (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature® (EBSCO Information Services, Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA) and other databases were searched to retrieve CPGs. A total of five guidelines were included for analysis. The selected CPGs were appraised independently by five reviewers using the AGREE II instrument. The highest total score was achieved by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (91.4%) followed by the CPGs from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Canadian Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Resource Alliance, British Association of Psychopharmacology and the American Academy of Paediatrics. By appraising current ADHD guidelines, clinicians cannot only identify CPGs related to ADHD but can also determine which guidelines should be considered of high quality and trustworthy to follow during clinical practice. The researchers recommend using the AGREE II instrument for CPG appraisal in healthcare professional education and training. Improvements in the applicability of guidelines are warranted in the future to enhance its clinical use and relevance.
机译:本文提出了对临床实践指南(CPG)的全面审查,用于评估和/或诊断儿童和青少年的注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)。进行了系统审查,总结了CPG中报告的建议。 Medline®(国家医学图书馆,Bethesda,Maryland,USA),累计指数到护理和盟友的健康文献(EBSCO信息服务,Ipswich,Massachusetts,USA)和其他数据库被搜索到检索CPG。共有五项准则进行分析。使用“同意II仪器”,所选的CPGS独立评估。全国卫生和护理研究所(91.4%)实现的总分最高(91.4%)随后来自苏格兰际联络指南网络,加拿大注意力缺陷多动障碍资源联盟,英国精神职业和美国儿科学院协会。通过评估当前的ADHD指南,临床医生不能只识别与ADHD相关的CPGS,但也可以确定在临床实践期间考虑哪些准则应该考虑高质量和值得信赖的准则。研究人员建议在医疗保健专业教育和培训中使用CPG评估的同意II仪器。未来有权提高指南适用性的改进,以提高其临床使用和相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号