首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Are Psychology University Student Gamblers Representative of Non-university Students and General Gamblers? A Comparative Analysis
【2h】

Are Psychology University Student Gamblers Representative of Non-university Students and General Gamblers? A Comparative Analysis

机译:心理学大学生赌徒是非大学学生和一般赌徒的代表吗?比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Students recruited from psychology undergraduate university populations are commonly used in psychology research, including gambling studies. However, the extent to which the use of this subpopulation produces findings that can be extrapolated to other groups is questionable. The present study was designed to compare results from university-recruited psychology student gamblers to those obtained from a sample of gamblers recruited from the general population that also included students. An online survey measuring gambling behavior and Internet gambling, attitudes and knowledge about gambling and problem gambling severity was posted on websites accessed by gamblers. Participants were recruited from two sources, a psychology undergraduate university population (n = 461) and online websites (n = 4,801). Results showed university-recruited students differed significantly from both adults and students recruited from the general population in respect to demographic variables and gambling behavior. Psychology undergraduate students were younger, more likely to be female, and had lower incomes. When relevant demographic variables were controlled, psychology undergraduate students were found to gamble less frequently, at different times, and to be at lower-risk for gambling-related problems, but had more irrational beliefs and more negative attitudes towards gambling than gamblers recruited from the general population. Results suggest that caution should be used in extrapolating findings from research using university-recruited psychology student gamblers to wide community populations due to differences related to gambling thoughts, attitudes and behaviors.
机译:从心理学大学本科生中招募的学生通常用于心理学研究,包括赌博研究。但是,使用这种亚群在多大程度上可以推断出其他人群的发现值得怀疑。本研究旨在比较大学招募的心理学学生赌徒的结果与从也包括学生在内的普通人群招募的赌徒样本中获得的结果进行比较。在赌徒访问的网站上发布了一项在线调查,该调查测量赌博行为和互联网赌博,关于赌博的态度和知识以及问题赌博的严重性。参与者是从两个来源招募的,心理学大学的大学人口(n = 461)和在线网站(n = 4,801)。结果显示,就人口统计学变量和赌博行为而言,大学招生的学生与成年人和从普通人群招募的学生均存在显着差异。心理学本科生较年轻,更有可能是女性,并且收入较低。当控制了相关的人口统计学变量时,发现心理学的大学生在不同时间赌博的频率较低,并且在与赌博相关的问题中处于较低的风险,但与从赌博场所招募的赌徒相比,他们的赌博更具非理性信念和消极态度。总人口。结果表明,由于与赌博思想,态度和行为有关的差异,在使用大学招募的心理学学生赌徒进行的研究向广泛的社区人群推断研究结果时应谨慎行事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号