首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Magnitude of change with antidepressants and placebo in antidepressant clinical trials using structured taped and appraised rater interviews (SIGMA-RAPS) compared to trials using traditional semi-structured interviews
【2h】

Magnitude of change with antidepressants and placebo in antidepressant clinical trials using structured taped and appraised rater interviews (SIGMA-RAPS) compared to trials using traditional semi-structured interviews

机译:与使用传统的半结构化访谈进行的结构化录音化和评估式访谈(SIGMA-RAPS)相比抗抑郁药和安慰剂在抗抑郁症临床试验中的变化幅度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

RationaleAlthough newer interview methods such as Structured Interview Guide for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA; MADRS) with audiotaping and Rater Applied Performance Scale (RAPS) appraisal have been introduced to improve reliability of ratings in antidepressant clinical trials, there is limited evidence that these methods actually improve trial outcome.
机译:原理尽管引入了新的访谈方法,例如《蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表的结构化面试指南》(SIGMA; MADRS),录音带和评估者应用性能量表(RAPS),以提高抗抑郁药临床试验中评分的可靠性,但证据有限这些方法实际上可以改善试验结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号