首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Defining the real-world reproducibility of visual grading of left ventricular function and visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction: impact of image quality experience and accreditation
【2h】

Defining the real-world reproducibility of visual grading of left ventricular function and visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction: impact of image quality experience and accreditation

机译:定义左心室功能视觉分级和左心室射血分数的视觉估计的真实再现性:图像质量经验和认证的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Left ventricular function can be evaluated by qualitative grading and by eyeball estimation of ejection fraction (EF). We sought to define the reproducibility of these techniques, and how they are affected by image quality, experience and accreditation. Twenty apical four-chamber echocardiographic cine loops (Online Resource 1–20) of varying image quality and left ventricular function were anonymized and presented to 35 operators. Operators were asked to provide (1) a one-phrase grading of global systolic function (2) an “eyeball” EF estimate and (3) an image quality rating on a 0–100 visual analogue scale. Each observer viewed every loop twice unknowingly, a total of 1400 viewings. When grading LV function into five categories, an operator’s chance of agreement with another operator was 50 % and with themself on blinded re-presentation was 68 %. Blinded eyeball LVEF re-estimates by the same operator had standard deviation (SD) of difference of 7.6 EF units, with the SD across operators averaging 8.3 EF units. Image quality, defined as the average of all operators’ assessments, correlated with EF estimate variability (r = −0.616, p < 0.01) and visual grading agreement (r = 0.58, p < 0.01). However, operators’ own single quality assessments were not a useful forewarning of their estimate being an outlier, partly because individual quality assessments had poor within-operator reproducibility (SD of difference 17.8). Reproducibility of visual grading of LV function and LVEF estimation is dependent on image quality, but individuals cannot themselves identify when poor image quality is disrupting their LV function estimate. Clinicians should not assume that patients changing in grade or in visually estimated EF have had a genuine clinical change.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0659-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:左心室功能可通过定性分级和眼球射血分数(EF)进行评估。我们试图定义这些技术的可再现性,以及它们如何受到图像质量,经验和认证的影响。匿名显示了二十个心尖四腔超声心动图电影环(在线资源1-20),其图像质量和左心室功能各不相同,并呈现给35位操作者。要求操作者提供(1)全局收缩功能的一阶段评分(2)“眼球” EF估计和(3)0-100视觉模拟量表的图像质量等级。每个观察者在不知不觉中两次观看了每个循环,总共观看了1400次。将LV功能划分为五类时,一个操作员与另一个操作员达成协议的机会是50%,在盲目重新表示中与他们自己达成协议的机会是68%。同一操作员重新估计的盲眼LVEF的标准差(SD)为7.6 EF单位,而各操作员的SD平均为8.3 EF单位。图像质量定义为所有操作员评估的平均值,与EF估计变异性(r = −0.616,p <0.01)和视觉分级协议(r = 0.58,p <0.01)相关。但是,运营商自己的单一质量评估并不能有效地警告他们的估计值是离群值,部分原因是单个质量评估的运营商内部可重复性很差(差异SD为17.8)。 LV功能和LVEF估计的视觉分级的可重复性取决于图像质量,但是当图像质量差会影响其LV功能估计时,个人无法自己确定。临床医生不应该认为分级或视觉估计EF改变的患者有真正的临床改变。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s10554-015-0659-1)包含补充材料,可用于授权用户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号