首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable development: a typology based on grounded theory
【2h】

How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable development: a typology based on grounded theory

机译:研究人员如何为可持续发展做出科学贡献:基于扎根理论的类型学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Given that research on sustainable development usually relates to real-world challenges, it requires researchers to align scientific knowledge production with concrete societal problem situations. To empirically explore how researchers frame scientific contributions when designing and planning projects, we conducted a qualitative study on land use–related projects based on the methodology of grounded theory. We identified major influence factors and various types of research design. Among the factors that influence project framing, scientific considerations were found to be more important than expected. Core characteristics of project framings concerned (a) type of scientific contributions envisaged; (b) real-world sustainability challenges addressed, and (c) researchers’ conceptions of how knowledge would reach its addressees. Three different types of project framing were found, suggesting that framing strongly depends on (the researchers’ perception of) how well a real-world problem situation is understood scientifically and how strongly are societal actors aware of the problem and act upon it. The spectrum of how researchers planned that knowledge would reach its addressees comprised communicating results to interactive conceptions allowing for mutual learning throughout the research process. The typology reveals a variety of useful and promising project framings for sustainable development research. The typology may serve to reconcile conceptual ideals and expectations with researchers’ realities.
机译:鉴于对可持续发展的研究通常与现实世界中的挑战有关,因此要求研究人员使科学知识的生产与具体的社会问题状况保持一致。为了从经验上探索研究人员在设计和规划项目时如何构建科学贡献,我们基于扎根理论的方法对与土地使用相关的项目进行了定性研究。我们确定了主要影响因素和各种类型的研究设计。在影响项目框架的因素中,发现科学考虑比预期更重要。有关项目框架的核心特征(a)设想的科学贡献类型; (b)解决了现实世界中的可持续性挑战,以及(c)研究人员对知识如何到达目标对象的构想。发现了三种不同类型的项目框架,这表明框架很大程度上取决于(研究人员的看法)科学上对现实问题状况的理解程度以及社会行为者对问题的认识和对问题采取的行动有多强烈。研究人员计划如何使知识到达目标对象的范围包括将结果传达给交互式概念,以便在整个研究过程中相互学习。该类型揭示了各种有用的,有希望的项目框架,用于可持续发展研究。这种类型学可以使概念理想和期望与研究人员的现实相协调。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号