首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Living Near to Attractive Nature? A Well-Being Indicator for Ranking Dutch Danish and German Functional Urban Areas
【2h】

Living Near to Attractive Nature? A Well-Being Indicator for Ranking Dutch Danish and German Functional Urban Areas

机译:生活在迷人的大自然附近?荷兰丹麦和德国功能性城市区域排名的良好指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While nature is widely acknowledged to contribute to people’s well-being, nature based well-being indicators at city-level appear to be underprovided. This study aims at filling this gap by introducing a novel indicator based on the proximity of city-residents to nature that is of high-amenity. High-amenity nature is operationalized by combining unique systematic data on people’s perceptions of what are the locations of attractive natural areas with data on natural land cover. The proposed indicator departs from the usual assumption of equal well-being from any nature, as it approximates the ‘actual’ subjective quality of nature near people’s homes in a spatially explicit way. Such indicator is used to rank 148 ‘cities’ in the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. International comparability of the indicator is enhanced by the use of a definition of cities as functional urban areas (FUAs), which are consistently identified across countries. Results demonstrate that the average ‘nearness’ of FUA populations to high amenity nature varies widely across the observed FUAs. A key finding, that complements insights from existing city-level indicators, is that while populations of FUAs with higher population densities may live relatively far from nature in general, they also live, on average, closer to high-amenity nature than inhabitants of lower density FUAs. Our results may stimulate policy-debates on how to combine urban agglomeration with access to natural amenities in order to account for people’s wellbeing.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1375-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:尽管人们普遍认为大自然有助于人们的福祉,但在城市一级基于大自然的福祉指标似乎提供不足。这项研究旨在通过引入一种新颖的指标来填补这一空白,该指标基于城市居民与大自然的亲近程度。高舒适度自然是通过将有关人们对有吸引力的自然区域的位置的看法的独特系统数据与自然土地覆盖数据相结合而实现的。拟议的指标有别于任何自然的平等福祉的通常假设,因为它以空间明确的方式逼近人们家附近自然的“实际”主观质量。该指标用于对荷兰,丹麦和德国的148个“城市”进行排名。该指标的国际可比性通过使用城市作为功能性城市区域(FUA)的定义而得到增强,而在各个国家/地区都一致地确定了这些功能。结果表明,在所观察到的FUA中,FUA人群对高舒适性的平均“接近度”差异很大。一个重要的发现补充了现有城市水平指标的见解,是虽然人口密度较高的农民协会人口总体上可能与自然生活距离相对较远,但与低收入者相比,他们平均生活在更舒适的自然环境中密度FUA。我们的结果可能会引发有关如何将城市群与自然设施的使用相结合以解决人们的福祉问题的政策辩论。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s11205-016-1375-5)包含补充材料,可供授权用户使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号