首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Field evidence of bird poisonings by imidacloprid-treated seeds: a review of incidents reported by the French SAGIR network from 1995 to 2014
【2h】

Field evidence of bird poisonings by imidacloprid-treated seeds: a review of incidents reported by the French SAGIR network from 1995 to 2014

机译:吡虫啉处理过的种子引起鸟类中毒的现场证据:对法国SAGIR网络1995年至2014年报告的事件的回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The large-scale use of neonicotinoid insecticides has raised growing concerns about their potential adverse effects on farmland birds, and more generally on biodiversity. Imidacloprid, the first neonicotinoid commercialized, has been identified as posing a risk for seed-eating birds when it is used as seed treatment of some crops since the consumption of a few dressed seeds could cause mortality. But evidence of direct effects in the field is lacking. Here, we reviewed the 103 wildlife mortality incidents reported by the French SAGIR Network from 1995 to 2014, for which toxicological analyses detected imidacloprid residues. One hundred and one incidents totalling at least 734 dead animals were consistent with an agricultural use as seed treatment. Grey partridges (Perdix perdix) and “pigeons” (Columba palumbus, Columba livia and Columba oenas) were the main species found. More than 70% of incidents occurred during autumn cereal sowings. Furthermore, since there is no biomarker for diagnosing neonicotinoid poisonings, we developed a diagnostic approach to estimate the degree of certainty that these mortalities were due to imidacloprid poisoning. By this way, the probability that mortality was due to poisoning by imidacloprid-treated seeds was ranked as at least “likely” in 70% of incidents. As a result, this work provides clear evidence to risk managers that lethal effects due to the consumption by birds of imidacloprid-treated seeds regularly occur in the field. This in turn raises the question of the effectiveness of the two main factors (seed burying and imidacloprid-treated seeds avoidance) that are supposed to make the risk to birds negligible. Risk factors and the relevance of mitigation measures are discussed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11356-016-8272-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:大量使用新烟碱类杀虫剂引起了人们越来越关注它们对农田鸟类以及更广泛地对生物多样性的潜在不利影响的担忧。吡虫啉是第一种商业化的新烟碱类化合物,当用于某些农作物的种子处理时,已被识别为有食种子鸟类的风险,因为食用一些有苗种子可能会导致死亡。但是,缺乏在该领域直接影响的证据。在这里,我们回顾了法国SAGIR网络从1995年至2014年报告的103次野生动植物死亡事件,其中毒理学分析检测到了吡虫啉残留。总共有734只死亡动物发生了110次事故,这与将农业用于种子处理相一致。灰species(Perdix perdix)和“鸽子”(Columba palumbus,Columba livia和Columba oenas)是发现的主要物种。超过70%的事件发生在秋季谷物播种期间。此外,由于没有用于诊断新烟碱中毒的生物标志物,我们开发了一种诊断方法来估计这些死亡率是由吡虫啉中毒引起的。通过这种方式,在70%的事件中,死亡率是由于吡虫啉处理过的种子中毒而导致的。结果,这项工作为风险管理者提供了明确的证据,即在田间经常发生因鸟食吡虫啉处理过的种子而造成的致死作用。这又提出了两个主要因素(种子埋藏和吡虫啉处理的种子避免)的有效性问题,这两个因素对禽类的影响可以忽略不计。电子辅助材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s11356-016-8272-y)包含辅助材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号