首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5 carbon dioxide challenge study
【2h】

State anxiety and information processing: A 7.5 carbon dioxide challenge study

机译:状态焦虑和信​​息处理:7.5%的二氧化碳挑战研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We used the 7.5% carbon dioxide model of anxiety induction to investigate the effects of state anxiety on simple information processing. In both high- and low-anxious states, participants (n = 36) completed an auditory–visual matching task and a . The stimuli were either degraded or clear, so as to investigate whether the effects of anxiety are greater when signal clarity is compromised. Accuracy in the matching task was lower during CO2 inhalation and for degraded stimuli. In the categorization task, response times and indecision (measured using mouse trajectories) were greater during CO2 inhalation and for degraded stimuli. For most measures, we found no evidence of Gas × Clarity interactions. These data indicate that state anxiety negatively impacts simple information processing and do not support claims that anxiety may benefit performance in low-cognitively-demanding tasks. These findings have important implications for understanding the impact of state anxiety in real-world situations.
机译:我们使用了7.5%的焦虑诱导二氧化碳模型来研究状态焦虑对简单信息处理的影响。在高焦虑状态和低焦虑状态下,参与者(n = 36)均完成了听觉-视觉匹配任务和。刺激是退化的还是清晰的,以便研究当信号的清晰度受损时焦虑的影响是否更大。匹配任务的准确性在吸入二氧化碳和刺激降解时较低。在分类任务中,在吸入二氧化碳和刺激性降低的情况下,响应时间和犹豫不决(使用鼠标轨迹测量)更大。对于大多数测量,我们没有发现气体×净度相互作用的证据。这些数据表明,状态焦虑会对简单的信息处理产生负面影响,并且不支持这样的说法:焦虑可能会使低认知需求的任务中的性能受益。这些发现对于理解现实世界中状态焦虑的影响具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号