首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Improving PrEP Implementation Through Multilevel Interventions: A Synthesis of the Literature
【2h】

Improving PrEP Implementation Through Multilevel Interventions: A Synthesis of the Literature

机译:通过多层次干预改善PrEP实施:文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There are many challenges to accessing PrEP and thus low uptake in the United States. This review (2007–2017) of PrEP implementation identified barriers to PrEP and interventions to match those barriers. The final set of articles (n = 47) included content on cognitive aspects of HIV service providers and individuals at risk for infection, reviews, and case studies. Cognitive barriers and interventions regarding patients and providers included knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about PrEP. The “purview paradox” was identified as a key barrier—HIV specialists often do not see HIV-negative patients, while primary care physicians, who often see uninfected patients, are not trained to provide PrEP. Healthcare systems barriers included lack of communication about, funding for, and access to PrEP. The intersection between PrEP-stigma, HIV-stigma, transphobia, homophobia, and disparities across gender, racial, and ethnic groups were identified; but few interventions addressed these barriers. We recommend multilevel interventions targeting barriers at multiple socioecological domains.
机译:获得PrEP面临许多挑战,因此在美国吸收率低。对PrEP实施的此次审查(2007年至2017年)确定了PrEP的障碍以及与这些障碍相匹配的干预措施。最后一组文章(n = 47)包括有关HIV服务提供者和有感染风险的个人的认知方面的内容,评论和案例研究。有关患者和提供者的认知障碍和干预措施包括有关PrEP的知识,态度和信念。 “权限悖论”被确定为主要障碍-HIV专家经常看不到HIV阴性患者,而经常见到未感染患者的初级保健医生没有接受过提供PrEP的培训。医疗保健系统的障碍包括缺乏与PrEP的沟通,资金和访问。确定了PrEP污名,HIV污名,恐惧症,同性恋恐惧症以及性别,种族和族裔之间的差异之间的交集;但是很少有干预措施可以解决这些障碍。我们建议针对多个社会生态领域的障碍的多层次干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号