首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The Post-Dictatorship Memory Politics in Portugal Which Erased Political Violence from the Collective Memory
【2h】

The Post-Dictatorship Memory Politics in Portugal Which Erased Political Violence from the Collective Memory

机译:葡萄牙的独裁后记忆政治从集体记忆中消除了政治暴力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Former clandestine militants’ voices and stories have been recurrently silenced in the Portuguese “battle over memory”, because their activities were linked to events, such as the Revolution of 25 April 1974, which have themselves been politically and socially depreciated in mainstream political narratives. Only recently did the traditional political narratives start to be questioned and debated by Portuguese scholars. Such political narratives took root in the country in the decades that followed the April Revolution, with various scholars and politicians denying the fascist categorisation of Estado Novo and adopting an authoritarian, non-totalitarian and non-fascist perspective, while recurrently depicting the Revolution as highly negative (namely as the source of the economic troubles of the country). Thus, for a long time, Portuguese conservatives opted to avoid debates on the 48 years of the Estado Novo’s regime which, among other things, maintained a very repressive and violent political police force, a camp of forced labour in Cape Vert known as Tarrafal, and a Colonial War on three African fronts. This article examines the existent academic publications which counter such oblivion of memory regarding armed struggle in Portugal. It also explores the reasons behind, on the one hand, the whitewashing of Estado Novo and the historical revisionism typical of the 1970s and 1980s, and, on the other hand, the “rebellion of memory” which emerged in the 1990s.
机译:前秘密武装分子的声音和故事在葡萄牙的“记忆之战”中经常被沉默,因为他们的活动与诸如1974年4月25日的革命之类的事件有关,这些事件本身在主流政治叙事中在政治和社会上都被贬低。直到最近,传统的政治叙事才开始受到葡萄牙学者的质疑和辩论。这种政治叙事在四月革命后的几十年中扎根于该国,各种学者和政治家否认埃斯塔多·诺沃的法西斯主义分类,并采用了专制,非专制和非法西斯主义的观点,同时又将革命描述为高度负面的(即作为国家经济麻烦的根源)。因此,很长一段时间以来,葡萄牙保守派一直选择避免就Estado Novo政权的48年进行辩论,该政权除其他外,维持了一支非常压制和暴力的政治警察部队,这是在佛得角称为塔拉拉夫的一个强迫劳动营地,以及在三个非洲战线上的殖民战争。本文研究了现有的学术出版物,这些出版物消除了人们对葡萄牙武装斗争的记忆遗忘。它也探究了背后的原因,一方面是对埃斯塔多·诺沃(Estado Novo)的粉饰和1970年代和1980年代典型的历史修正主义,另一方面是1990年代出现的“记忆的叛逆”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号