首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Selling science 2.0: What scientific projects receive crowdfunding online?
【2h】

Selling science 2.0: What scientific projects receive crowdfunding online?

机译:Selling science 2.0:哪些科学项目可以在线获得众筹?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Crowdfunding has emerged as an additional source for financing research in recent years. The study at hand identifies and tests explanatory factors influencing the success of scientific crowdfunding projects by drawing on news value theory, the “reputation signaling” approach, and economic theories of online payment. A standardized content analysis of 371 projects on English- and German-language platforms reveals that each theory provides factors influencing crowdfunding success. It shows that projects presented on science-only crowdfunding platforms have a higher success rate. At the same time, projects are more likely to be successful if their presentation includes visualizations and humor, the lower their targeted funding is, the less personal data potential donors have to relinquish and the more interaction between researchers and donors is possible. This suggests that after donors decide to visit a scientific crowdfunding platform, factors unrelated to science matter more for subsequent funding decisions, raising questions about the potential and implications of crowdfunding science.
机译:近年来,众筹已成为资助研究的另一种来源。这项研究利用新闻价值理论,“声誉信号”方法和在线支付的经济理论,确定并测试了影响科学众筹项目成功的解释性因素。对英语和德语平台上371个项目的标准化内容分析表明,每种理论都提供影响众筹成功的因素。它表明,仅基于科学的众筹平台上提出的项目具有较高的成功率。同时,如果项目的介绍包括可视化和幽默,项目就更有可能取得成功,其目标资金越低,潜在捐赠者放弃的个人数据就越少,研究者与捐赠者之间的互动也就越多。这表明,在捐助者决定访问科学众筹平台之后,与科学无关的因素对于后续的资助决策更为重要,从而引发了有关众筹科学的潜力和影响的疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号