首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? The role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms
【2h】

How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? The role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms

机译:如何了解欧洲的非正式照料方式?正式的长期护理规定和家庭护理规范的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aims: Motivated by ageing populations, healthcare policies increasingly emphasize the role of informal care. This study examines how prevalence rates of informal caregivers and intensive caregivers (i.e. those who provide informal care for at least 11 hours a week) vary between European countries, and to what extent informal caregiving and intensive caregiving relate to countries’ formal long-term care provisions and family care norms. Methods: Multilevel logistic regression analyses on data from the European Social Survey Round 7 (n = 32,894 respondents in n = 19 countries) were used to test (a) contradicting hypotheses regarding the role of formal long-term care provisions based on crowding-out, crowding-in and specialization arguments and (b) the hypothesis that strong family care norms are positively related to (intensive) informal caregiving. Results: Prevalence rates of informal caregiving varied between European countries, from 20% to 44%. Intensive caregiving ranged from 4% to 11%. Opposite patterns regarding the role of formal long-term care provisions were revealed: generous long-term care provisions in a country were related to a higher likelihood of providing informal care, but a lower likelihood of providing intensive care. Moreover, intensive caregiving was more likely when family care norms in a country were strong. >Conclusions: This study provided support for the specialization argument by showing that generous formal long-term care provisions crowded-out intensive caregiving, but also encouraged more people to provide (some) informal care. Because especially intensive caregiving is burdensome, low levels of formal long-term care provisions might bring risks to caregivers’ well-being and healthcare systems’ sustainability.
机译:目的:受人口老龄化的影响,医疗保健政策越来越强调非正式护理的作用。这项研究调查了欧洲国家之间非正式护理者和重症监护者(即每周至少提供11小时的非正式护理者)的患病率如何变化,以及非正式护理和重症监护与国家正规长期护理之间的关系规定和家庭护理规范。方法:对来自欧洲社会调查第7轮(n = 19个国家/地区的32894名受访者)的数据进行多级logistic回归分析,以检验(a)与基于挤出的正式长期护理规定的作用相反的假设,拥挤和专业化争论,以及(b)强有力的家庭护理规范与(密集)非正式护理正相关的假设。结果:欧洲国家之间非正式护理的患病率有所不同,从20%到44%。重症监护的范围从4%到11%。揭示了与正式长期护理规定的作用相反的模式:一个国家的慷慨长期护理规定与提供非正式护理的可能性较高,但与提供重症监护的可能性较低有关。此外,当一个国家的家庭照护规范很强时,就更有可能进行重症监护。 >结论:本研究通过证明慷慨的正式长期护理规定排挤了重症监护,为该专业化论点提供了支持,但也鼓励了更多的人提供(一些)非正式护理。由于特别密集的护理工作非常繁重,因此正规的长期护理服务水平较低可能会给护理人员的健康和医疗系统的可持续性带来风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号