首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Efficiency or compensation? The global economic crisis and thedevelopment of the European Union’s social policy
【2h】

Efficiency or compensation? The global economic crisis and thedevelopment of the European Union’s social policy

机译:效率还是补偿?全球经济危机与欧盟社会政策的发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

How has the global social policy agenda evolved since the global economic crisis? To shed light on this question, this article looks at the discourses in European Union (EU) social policy. It draws on two rival theoretical approaches from the literature on globalisation and the welfare state, the efficiency and compensation hypotheses, and links these approaches to two fundamental rationales underlying the discourse in EU social policy. Based on an analysis of key documents from two Open Methods of Coordination (OMCs), the article shows that the logic underlying the efficiency hypothesis can be extended to discourses in EU social policy. While policy debates in one OMC remained largely unchanged, the discourse significantly shifted towards the economic rationale during and after the crisis in the other OMC. This suggests that the crisis at least partly strengthened the view that social policy should be geared towards economic efficiency, growth, and the creation of jobs.
机译:自全球经济危机以来,全球社会政策议程如何演变?为了阐明这个问题,本文着眼于欧盟(EU)社会政策的论述。它借鉴了关于全球化和福利国家,效率和补偿假说的两种对立的理论方法,并将这些方法与构成欧盟社会政策论述基础的两个基本理论联系起来。基于对两种开放式协调方法(OMC)的关键文件的分析,该文章表明,效率假设的基础逻辑可以扩展到欧盟社会政策中的论述。尽管一个OMC的政策辩论在很大程度上保持不变,但论述在另一OMC危机期间和危机之后已转向经济原理。这表明,这场危机至少部分增强了以下观点:社会政策应针对经济效率,增长和创造就业机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号