首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Simulation of pedestrian evacuation route choice using social force model in large-scale public space: Comparison of five evacuation strategies
【2h】

Simulation of pedestrian evacuation route choice using social force model in large-scale public space: Comparison of five evacuation strategies

机译:大型公共空间中使用社会力量模型模拟行人疏散路径选择:五种疏散策略的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The primary objective of this study is to compare pedestrian evacuation strategies in the large-scale public space (LPS) using microscopic model. Data were collected by video recording from Tian-yi square for 36 hours in city of Ningbo, China. A pedestrian evacuation simulation model was developed based on the social force model (SFM). The simulation model parameters, such as reaction time, elasticity coefficient, sliding coefficient, et al, were calibrated using the real data extracted from the video. Five evacuation strategies, strategy 1 (S1) to strategy 5 (S5) involving distance, density and capacity factors were simulated and compared by indicators of evacuation time and channel utilization rate, as well as the evacuation efficiency. The simulation model parameters calibration results showed that a) the pedestrians walking speed is 1.0 ~ 1.5m/s; b) the pedestrians walking diameter is 0.3 ~ 0.4m; c) the frequency of pedestrian arrival and departure followed multi-normal distribution. The simulation results showed that, (a) in terms of total evacuation time, the performance of S4 and S5 which considering the capacity and density factors were best in all evacuation scenarios, the performance of S3 which only considering the density factor was the worst, relatively, and S1 and S2 which considering the distance factor were in the middle. (b) the utilization rate of channels under S5 strategy was better than other strategies, which performs best in the balance of evacuation. S3 strategy was the worst, and S1, S2 and S4 were in the middle. (c) in terms of the evacuation efficiency, when the number of evacuees is within 2, 500 peds, the S1 and S2 strategy which considering the distance factor have best evacuation efficiency than other strategies. And when the number of evacuees is above 2, 500 peds, the S4 and S5 strategy which considering the capacity factor are better than others.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是使用微观模型比较大型公共空间(LPS)中的行人疏散策略。通过录像从中国宁波市的天一广场收集了36个小时的数据。基于社会力量模型(SFM)开发了行人疏散模拟模型。仿真模型参数,例如反应时间,弹性系数,滑动系数等,已使用从视频中提取的真实数据进行了校准。模拟了五个疏散策略,涉及距离,密度和容量因子的策略1(S1)到策略5(S5),并通过疏散时间和通道利用率以及疏散效率的指标进行了比较。仿真模型的参数标定结果表明:a)行人步行速度为1.0〜1.5m / s; b)行人的行走直径为0.3〜0.4m; c)行人到达和离开的频率遵循多正态分布。仿真结果表明:(a)就总疏散时间而言,考虑容量和密度因子的S4和S5在所有疏散情况下的性能均最佳,仅考虑密度因子的S3的性能最差,相对而言,考虑距离因子的S1和S2位于中间。 (b)S5策略下的渠道利用率优于其他策略,后者在疏散平衡方面表现最佳。 S3策略最差,而S1,S2和S4在中间。 (c)就疏散效率而言,当疏散人数在2,500 peds以内时,考虑距离因素的S1和S2策略比其他策略具有最佳疏散效率。当疏散人数超过2、500 peds时,考虑容量因素的S4和S5策略要比其他策略更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号