首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Would you like to leave Beijing, Shanghai, or Shenzhen? An empirical analysis of migration effect in China
【2h】

Would you like to leave Beijing, Shanghai, or Shenzhen? An empirical analysis of migration effect in China

机译:您要离开北京,上海还是深圳?中国移民效应的实证分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aims to estimate the migration effect of the overall samples and different flowing scales for the floating population from the perspective of personal wages. Although we used both the OLS and PSM methods to estimate the migration effect, we found that the PSM method was preferred in the study of migration as a result of the selection bias. The empirical results show that there is a significant difference in wage before and after migration. In fact, migration increased wages by 15.18% to 23.63% overall. Additionally, wages were increased by 44.96% to 59.20%, 23.06% to 26.18%, and 10.89% to 15.08% respectively for these three migration patterns: flowing into the three largest megacities, inter-provincial migration, and inter-city migration within a province, but for this pattern of inter-district migration within a city, the migration effect is not significant. We concluded that the floating population removing policies of the largest megacities maybe are effective because of the administrative power of their government. On the other hand, for these policies of non-largest megacities to attract labor and local employment and local urbanization near the floating population’s place of origin, they were not effective enough as a result of the lack of significant migration effect in these cities.
机译:这项研究旨在从个人工资的角度估计总体样本和不同流动规模对流动人口的迁移影响。尽管我们同时使用OLS和PSM方法来估计迁移效果,但由于选择偏倚,我们发现PSM方法在迁移研究中是首选。实证结果表明,移民前后的工资存在显着差异。实际上,移民总体上使工资增加了15.18%,达到23.63%。此外,在以下三种迁移模式中,工资分别增长了44.96%至59.20%,23.06%至26.18%和10.89%至15.08%:流入三个最大的大城市,省际迁移和城市内的城市间迁移。省,但是对于这种城市间跨地区迁移的模式,迁移效果并不明显。我们得出的结论是,由于大城市的政府管理权,大型大城市的流动人口迁徙政策可能是有效的。另一方面,由于这些非大城市的政策在流动人口原籍地附近吸引劳动力和当地就业,以及城市化进程,由于这些城市缺乏重大的移民效应,它们的效力不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号