首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Research on supply chain performance based on retailers’ fairness concerns: Wholesale prices versus cost sharing of efforts
【2h】

Research on supply chain performance based on retailers’ fairness concerns: Wholesale prices versus cost sharing of efforts

机译:基于零售商公平性考虑的供应链绩效研究:批发价格与成本分担

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the deepening of the research on supply chain management, scholars have increasingly begun to investigate the impact of fairness on a supply chain, and many conclusions suggest that a simple wholesale price can coordinate a supply chain under specific conditions. However, the corresponding analysis and other optimization mechanisms that affect the situation in which the channel cannot be coordinated are either omitted or given little attention. In this paper, we constructed a dyadic supply chain with a single manufacturer and a single retailer; the manufacturer acts as a selfish leader, and the retailer acts as a follower with fairness concerns and sales efforts. For this setting, we derived the equilibrium strategy solution for a wholesale price contract and cost sharing of effort (CS-E) contract offered by the manufacturer, and the results indicated that both contracts achieved channel coordination with different requirements. Further, the profit of the manufacturer and the sales effort of the retailer under CS-E contracts were never less than those for the wholesale price contract, and there was an interval during which the retailer's profit and utility and supply chain efficiency were better than those under the wholesale price contract. In addition, we described situations in which a CS-E contract is unnecessary. These results should be a useful reference for managerial decisions and organizations.
机译:随着对供应链管理研究的不断深入,学者们越来越多地开始研究公平对供应链的影响,许多结论表明,简单的批发价格可以在特定条件下协调供应链。但是,忽略了影响通道无法协调的情况的相应分析和其他优化机制,或者对此给予了很少的关注。在本文中,我们构建了由单个制造商和单个零售商组成的二元供应链。制造商扮演自私的领导者,零售商扮演追随者,关注公平性和销售努力。在这种情况下,我们推导出了制造商提供的批发价格合同和工作成本分担合同(CS-E)的均衡策略解决方案,结果表明这两个合同都实现了不同需求的渠道协调。此外,根据CS-E合同,制造商的利润和零售商的销售努力绝不会低于批发价格合同,并且在一定的间隔内,零售商的利润,效用和供应链效率要优于那些。根据批发价合同。另外,我们描述了不需要CS-E合同的情况。这些结果应该为管理决策和组织提供有用的参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号